• circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m not trying to drag anything down. But I think it is important for many people to realize that the meshtastic is ultimately a ham device. It is using specific parts of the spectrum and reduced power to avoid needing the license. There’s nothing wrong with that, but by definition, it isn’t really adding anything that can’t also be done on ham. In a similar vein, the only direction to go in terms of enhancing its capabilities is further into ham.

    And no, I didn’t spend a bunch of time doing anything. People vastly overestimate the complexity of the ham radio exams.

    But by all means, use what you want to communicate. I’m not trying to dissuade anyone from it – I just think it’s important that they know the limitations of the device compared to the greater whole in which it exists.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      it isn’t really adding anything that can’t also be done on ham.

      Encryption, affordability, ease of access.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It is a misconception that you cannot do encryption with ham radio.

        Affordability – looks like a wash to me.

        Ease of access – maybe. But it generally does less, so it’s a tradeoff.