With no indication that VoidLink is actively targeting machines, there’s no immediate action required by defenders, although they can obtain indicators of compromise from the Checkpoint blog post.
Don’t click on the article. It’s an AI regurgitated summary and internet rot site.
It might help if you actually said something rather than just trolling with below average bait (assuming you are trolling and not just intellectually battling a door stop for 3rd place)
Don’t click on the article. It’s an AI regurgitated summary and internet rot site.
You’re welcome.
Did you just call Ars Technica an “internet rot site”?
Good way to make it obvious you don’t know what you’re talking about without saying you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Do I need to repeat myself or is your skull too thick? Try using those links in a year from now Ars is literally an Arse of the tech industry.
It might help if you actually said something rather than just trolling with below average bait (assuming you are trolling and not just intellectually battling a door stop for 3rd place)
Ok, noted. Troll identified and blocked.
“oh no someone said the truth but it hurts my feelings” blocked
Considering Dan isn’t a bot and responds to comments in the forum, I suspect you have no clue what you’re talking about.
The sourced research he cites is also not AI generated.
Ars technica is usually legit.
‘Usually’ being the operating word. It’s still a media Corp owned company part of Condé Nast, like Wired.
Yeah! AI bad!
Give him the updoots for saying it!
you’re AI on an internet rot site.