Dude. You can’t even state your actual position. I can’t read your mind. You could literally be a Nazi, an Accelerationist, or a leftist that never read a history book from what you said.
I literally gave you a chance for a conversation around your original comment. What a pathetic response.
You afraid to say the answer is “violence”? Like we could have a conversation theoretically around that. (Obviously not advocating for it).
But your criticism of non violence is the opposite position of people that historically have written about when violence is necessary. Starting from the point of criticism of non violence is a position of an uneducated idiot that would never be able to understand when violence is required. Those people, historically, are critizing the oppression that made non violence impossible.
Dude. You can’t even state your actual position. I can’t read your mind. You could literally be a Nazi, an Accelerationist, or a leftist that never read a history book from what you said.
I literally gave you a chance for a conversation around your original comment. What a pathetic response.
You afraid to say the answer is “violence”? Like we could have a conversation theoretically around that. (Obviously not advocating for it).
But your criticism of non violence is the opposite position of people that historically have written about when violence is necessary. Starting from the point of criticism of non violence is a position of an uneducated idiot that would never be able to understand when violence is required. Those people, historically, are critizing the oppression that made non violence impossible.