• 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 hours ago

    the fact that ministry of justice of any state, regardless of specific geopolitical problems going on at any given time, would just upload its data to any “cloud” no matter what state it is operated from, is mind blowing to me.

    you would really expect some standards for such sensitive data.

    • huppakee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      no matter what state it is operated from

      Not disagreeing, but if Trump hadn’t won a second term there really wouldn’t be a dire reason to avoid the US. Sure they would be better of choosing a local or at least European provider, but most politicians (naively) didn’t see the current hostility coming.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        AWS and other US cloud hosts do have data centers in various “regions” (countries) around the world. Some countries have requirements that the servers are physically located there. And iirc, as I worked with some of this in the past, as an example some EU countries for their services required that only EU citizens had certain types of access to those systems. Ultimately they are still owned by US companies. But those companies try to accommodate their access requirements, in order to get their business. Not saying EU shouldn’t move away from US companies, but wanted to clarify some existing policies.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          They’re still getting Amazon to store data that is critical to the function of the nation.

          Government documents shouldn’t be on other people’s computers.