Seems like buying games to remove them from your competitor is a scummier thing to do.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I dunno, killing the idea of ownership of games was pretty bad.

    I don’t think any amount of Proton patches submitted is going to bring that back.

    • doublah@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      But Steam didn’t kill the idea of ownership of games? It never existed for digital distribution (or even physical with DRM), which existed before Steam.

    • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Apparently a lot of games don’t have DRMs on Steam. The only thing missing is a badge indicating this.

      So at least you own these…

      • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Yes, some of them can be launched directly from the exe without the steam client, or with some modifications to the game files.

        Here’s a list of DRM free games: https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/List_of_DRM-free_games_on_Steam

        Also it’s kind of silly how people automatically blame Steam for this, even though Valve does not force you to use DRM to publish to Steam. It is the developers themselves that chose to add DRM or tie themselves to the Steam API so that the game can’t run without it.

        So for example getting Dorfromantik or Citizen Sleeper from Steam or GOG is virtually equivalent in terms of ownership.