So you have no more evidence than the jury who acquitted him, yet you still think he could have been acquitted. It’s obvious you have a motive here besides the truth of the matter. I’m glad people like you weren’t on that jury.
There’s evidence that they didn’t even get to see! So much of it, more than I am able to possibly list here.
It’s obvious you are pro the US courts, and can’t be trusted with serious decisions in any way. I would pray that if I ever went on a trial that you would be on my jury, because you are very naive and easy to manipulate. Why, with you on the jury I’d likely be acquitted!
Anyways, if 20 women say a man is a rapist, I think he’s a rapist. If 20 kids say a guy is a pedophile, I think they are a pedophile. And so on
But you go ahead and believe the “judges” like Clarence Thomas and Anthony Scalia, and their millionaire lawyer lackeys. It’s your call
So you have no more evidence than the jury who acquitted him, yet you still think he could have been acquitted. It’s obvious you have a motive here besides the truth of the matter. I’m glad people like you weren’t on that jury.
There’s evidence that they didn’t even get to see! So much of it, more than I am able to possibly list here.
It’s obvious you are pro the US courts, and can’t be trusted with serious decisions in any way. I would pray that if I ever went on a trial that you would be on my jury, because you are very naive and easy to manipulate. Why, with you on the jury I’d likely be acquitted!
Anyways, if 20 women say a man is a rapist, I think he’s a rapist. If 20 kids say a guy is a pedophile, I think they are a pedophile. And so on
But you go ahead and believe the “judges” like Clarence Thomas and Anthony Scalia, and their millionaire lawyer lackeys. It’s your call