• No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Isn’t the most foolproof method -and one that Trump has floated previously- just to not hold the elections?

    • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      Even Putin holds elections. He held elections in annexed Ukraine, too.

      And holding elections at all keeps Trump’s rule somewhat stable. If we know we’ll get another election, “we can all vote a little harder to get him out”. If elections simply don’t happen anymore, then people may seek other means to remove Trump, like assassination.

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      32 minutes ago

      Or just ignore the result. They might not be able to block every voting booth in the country, but they could easily block the newly elected Democrats being sworn in or even allowed inside the buildings. Then they start making laws without them. Who’s going to stop them?

    • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      not sure why you think that’s “foolproof” - he has no authority to do that, and it seems tantamount to a coup to stop elections without constitutional grounds