• mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Sure, but that’s not an argument for replacing Discord with forums. The two serve entirely different use cases, and should be treated like two entirely separate products.

    • gloktawasright@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Isn’t it though? A forum wouldn’t do all the things discord does, but the argument is that trying to use discord for a forum was a mistake in the first place. So replacing discord with a forum and then a dedicated chatting app makes sense, no?

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I think we’re essentially saying the same thing in different ways. Yes, I 100% agree that forums should be separate from whatever the new Discord replacement ends up being.

        I was more arguing that we can’t only use forums to replace Discord, because the realtime communication aspect would be a different use case. I’ve seen lots of “lol just use forums” types of posts, which completely ignore the realtime side of things. There would still need to be some service to replace the realtime aspects that Discord does serve.

        • gloktawasright@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          58 minutes ago

          Agreed. I think the fact that discord kind of does all the things is what made it attractive. But it’s not GOOD at the forum aspect, and it has its flaws for the other use cases as well.