Newsom and his team have successfully tapped into the need that many rank-and-file Democrats have for adopting a confrontational approach to Trump and his policies. But few people outside of California know much about the governor’s actual record — and many Democratic voters will be turned off to learn that his fervent opposition to a billionaire tax is part of an overall political approach that has trended more and more corporate-friendly.
A year ago, Newsom sent about 100 leaders of California-based companies a prepaid cell phone “programmed with Newsom’s digits and accompanied by notes from the governor himself,” POLITICO reported. One note to the CEO of a big tech corporation said, “If you ever need anything, I’m a phone call away.” While pandering to business elites, Newsom has slashed budgets to assist the poor and near-poor with healthcare, housing and food – in a state where seven million live under the official poverty line and child poverty rates are the highest in the nation.
…
“Governor Newsom’s reluctance to propose meaningful revenue solutions to help blunt the harm of federal cuts undermines his posture to counter the Trump administration.” The statement said that the proposed budget “will leave many Californians without food assistance and healthcare coverage.”
So far, key facts about Newsom’s policy priorities have scarcely gone beyond California’s borders. “National media have focused on Newsom as a personality and potential White House candidate and have almost completely ignored what he has and has not done as a governor,” said columnist Dan Walters, whose five decades covering California politics included 33 years at the Sacramento Bee. “It’s a perpetual failing of national political media to be more interested in image and gamesmanship rather than actual actions, the sizzle rather than the steak, and Newsom is very adept at exploiting that tendency.”
Also see https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/10/gavin-newsom-presidential-candidate-democrats
Like Trump, Newsom breaks promises, serves billionaire interests and mistakes social media theatrics for leadership. Is that really what American voters will want in 2028? After Richard Nixon, Americans chose Jimmy Carter. After George W Bush, they chose Barack Obama. After Trump, they’ll likely want change – authentic, strong, moral leadership, a leader with competence and vision.
Anywhere else in the country, Newsom would have run as a Republican.
Genuinely, if Newsom is selected by the Democratic party in 2028, nothing will change and we’ll be staring down the barrel of
trump 2.0the next fake populist/fascist in 2032.There are only two ways for the Democratic party to be relevant at this point:
But the Dems showed in NY how they feel about #1, and are refusing to do anything with #2 in Minnesota (and completely fumbled the opportunity they had over the last few
yearsdecades nationwide)Edit: for the pedantic twats that couldn’t infer my meaning
the further left we go the better
revolution is coming
shut down the country until the mods of hexbear are made leaders
they will save the world
i don’t want to endorse this as i don’t want to get banned or arrested but the further left we go we are headed to a utopia
i see it now
Have you seen Hilary making the rounds? Its fucking sick.
The only thing I’ve seen is her saying proudly that Bill and Obama were able to deport more people than trump “without killing people”
Which was pretty jarring. I don’t really understand who that rhetoric is supposed to appeal to.
I disagree with this. He has a quintessentially non-GOP and Progressive LEAN. It’s just he grew up rich, became MORE rich, then got into politics young, so the other half half of him is a piece of shit.
He likes to think he USED to be a piece of shit, but he’s still at least half a piece of shit.
Slicked back hair. Glass House. White Ferrari. Live for New Year’s Eve. Sloppy steaks at Truffoni’s. Big rare cut of meat with water dumped all over it, water splashing around the table…
If you think he’s progressive you must not live in California. We have a pretty progressive legislature and he vetoes EVERYTHING that upsets shareholders or techbros. He literally let PG&E get away with murdering 800 Californians, he allows PG&E to not buy back power from solar panels and he allowed 6 rate hikes last year so they could continue to make record shareholder profits. Now he’s fighting the one time 5% billionaire tax proposed by our legislators. He created a task force to hunt down teachers that teach the correct history on Palestine and under the guise of “antisemitism”. He also has time for a podcast somehow and he literally platforms Nazis and Zionists and agrees with them it’s disgusting. He’s Pelosi’s nephew and he’s basically a neoliberal republican
Geez you can’t jump scare me like that
Lol, sorry. Thread needs a TW
Oh no, now all the comments on this thread are going to read out in my internal voice artificially fast and it will make everyone sound smarmy af.
I don’t know what a watery steak is about? Can I have more information please?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buK45NW_ikI
All the not-Republicans need to pick a leader now. Before one is picked for them.
Jon Stewart or AOC. Right now I see them as the only viable options.
Sawn Fein, UAW boss for the late entry, Stewart and Fein and whatever else protest votes consolidate to one and endorse each other this time before any super tuesday type deal. Don’t let elizabeth warren types play spoiler this time. Our supposed progressive champion knowingly throwing the presidency to Biden, that I knew was going to fail, but she somehow didn’t?
Didn’t Fain pivot to supporting Trump at the last minute when he promised auto tariffs?My mistake, this was after the election
No.
He praised one set of Trumps tariffs last year.
https://www.wrur.org/npr-news/2025-04-07/uaw-president-shawn-fain-explains-why-he-supports-trumps-tariffs
That’s my mistake, I thought that happened before the election.
Idk. I’m not going to hold that against Fain, there are obvious reasons to need to support Tariffs given his position.
Tariffs are a union issue, and I support tariffs on countries that undercut us on labor and environmental as well. Not supporting that, and rather supporting wall street exporting our jobs, our factories, and our technology, to China and the like, signing 99 year leases and building their factories for them, to be able to enslave their populations, forcing them to work 6-12’s, 6 days a week, 12 hours a day, for starvation wages, and dump their toxins in the ditch, then bring it back here and undercut our remaining industry, forcing everyone to follow suit or go out of business, has led to a race to the bottom, both in labor and environmental regulations and in quality of products.
Only a fool wouldn’t support tariffs as such frankly. Not that the president could be trusted he is bad faith, but if the democrats didn’t abandon the working class the president wouldn’t have been able to do an end run around them, he never would’ve won 2016 without the trade issue he co-opted.
Just because the right co-opts something, do you oppose everything about that all of a sudden? If the republicans accuse you of stealing elections, just as a random hypothetical, while themselves stealing elections, do you defend all elections as safe even as they cheat? Do you not support laws that could provide safeguards against cheating, like giving a ticket with a number to a voter on request that could be referenced to make sure the vote was accurately counted after the fact? Because something has to be done, both because they are cheating, they are projecting that cheating, and the public on both sides doesn’t trust the elections anymore.
Same with trade, we all know globalism, neoliberalism, sold out the working classes, in the developed world, and most of all in the developing world being enslaved for the ruling class in those countries to develop, to use the greed of wall street to supplant those countries, to turn the inventors of the technology into consumers and not producers of those products it used to export, and cheap versions that break early at that.
As Bernie Sanders said when the president was elected in 2016, he was ready to work with him on trade on issues to protect the working class, even as we acknowledge he’s not in good faith and will not do it equitably. But evening the playing field to prevent selling out the working classes with tariffs is a Union Issue.
We never pick a leader, that’s a role exclusively delegated to the party. We have the illusion of choice with primaries but in the end the party always gets their pick
Only because we don’t do it. That’s the entire point. If we let the party do it as before we get Newsome, we lose and if by a miracle he wins nothing changes and he hands it back.
The party establishment’s biggest fear is losing control of the party from the donors’ tools, to popular reformers. That is behind everything they do electorally, in office everything they do also includes extracting money from the federal government for their donors, but winning is not their motivation, it’s keeping the left out.
If their early primary polling doesn’t have their chosen candidate leading they will have the others pull out and endorse who they want like they did Biden.
2020 was one of the few elections where the winner of the California primary didn’t get the party nomination because they forced Biden through by having everyone else backing out and endorse Biden
What is to stop us from doing this to them this time? Split the vote with a conservative democrat, but one on our side ultimately that won’t drop out. Agree with the moderates to drop out, but then change their mind and stay in the race at the last minute.
It’s for their own good. They can’t win.
We already have Trump 2.0
I think they mean whoever the next fascist is to become President once Trump is gone.
The shitlibs are desperate for the next fascist to be Newsom. If he won, then after his one and only disastrous term, we will get full blown Handmaids Tale in retaliation. If he loses — which is more likely — we just go straight to Handmaids Tale.
The only way this cycle is broken is by filling government with leftist reformationists and aggressively hunting and punishing every last Republican nazi. If a candidate isn’t a member of the DSA or something similar, they must be crushed by any and all means.
I have to assume at this point that anyone defending Newsom as a viable, reasonable candidate is a foreign agent.
Unless you’re referring to conspiracy theories about being replaced by a clone, I’m pretty sure it’s still the same guy
yes, trump 2.0 usually refers to this being his 2nd term. lets stay in reality please, its bad enough with out adding conspiracy theories.
Trump is still Trump, he has a second term, but he is still the same trump. No one calls the same person in their 2nd term “2.0” Trump 2.0 will be whoever the person that replaces Trump will be. He’ll be younger, and possibly more dangerous.
I got what you think the phrase ment but it has ready been taken to represent his second term.
By whom? Do you call FDR’s last term Roosevelt 4.0?
No, because no one called him that the way the internet, here in the real world, called Trump 2.0. Thanks for joining us.
You are the only person I’ve seen that calls Trumps 2nd term Trump 2.0.