Newsom and his team have successfully tapped into the need that many rank-and-file Democrats have for adopting a confrontational approach to Trump and his policies. But few people outside of California know much about the governor’s actual record — and many Democratic voters will be turned off to learn that his fervent opposition to a billionaire tax is part of an overall political approach that has trended more and more corporate-friendly.
A year ago, Newsom sent about 100 leaders of California-based companies a prepaid cell phone “programmed with Newsom’s digits and accompanied by notes from the governor himself,” POLITICO reported. One note to the CEO of a big tech corporation said, “If you ever need anything, I’m a phone call away.” While pandering to business elites, Newsom has slashed budgets to assist the poor and near-poor with healthcare, housing and food – in a state where seven million live under the official poverty line and child poverty rates are the highest in the nation.
…
“Governor Newsom’s reluctance to propose meaningful revenue solutions to help blunt the harm of federal cuts undermines his posture to counter the Trump administration.” The statement said that the proposed budget “will leave many Californians without food assistance and healthcare coverage.”
So far, key facts about Newsom’s policy priorities have scarcely gone beyond California’s borders. “National media have focused on Newsom as a personality and potential White House candidate and have almost completely ignored what he has and has not done as a governor,” said columnist Dan Walters, whose five decades covering California politics included 33 years at the Sacramento Bee. “It’s a perpetual failing of national political media to be more interested in image and gamesmanship rather than actual actions, the sizzle rather than the steak, and Newsom is very adept at exploiting that tendency.”
Also see https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/10/gavin-newsom-presidential-candidate-democrats
Like Trump, Newsom breaks promises, serves billionaire interests and mistakes social media theatrics for leadership. Is that really what American voters will want in 2028? After Richard Nixon, Americans chose Jimmy Carter. After George W Bush, they chose Barack Obama. After Trump, they’ll likely want change – authentic, strong, moral leadership, a leader with competence and vision.
I don’t disagree that Gavin is better than actual fascists, but we have two years to actually come up with someone better and protecting him now when it’s obvious how garbage he is isn’t helping us.
I do. Gavin Newsome is a fascist. He is in bed with big tech, who are fascists, and cozies up to fascists like Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk. He openly admits that his son is a fascist and he doesn’t care. He vetos human rights bills. He tries to make life unlivable for homeless people. He is a fascist.
So again, the nuance of the topic is lost-
IF- Gavin is the one to remain standing, I am suggesting we vote for him.
Big IF.
This isn’t to suggest that I support everything he is about- but I’d vote for anyone over suffering a single extra day with an addled gelatinous child molesterer.
And to be honest- if who ever is out there that is better, and they don’t stand and be counted soon, I will have zero faith that they’re the right person.
So this eliminates any 11th hour arrivals of spoiler 3rd party idiots that disappear and reappear like cicadas every four years. Say what you will about Gavin, but he’s getting his hands dirty at least. And that means more than the silence from [candidate].
Trump is the result of “lesser of two evils” voting. Maybe try doing something different this time?