Man aangehouden voor computervredebreuk na vergissing politie
www.politie.nl
De politie heeft donderdagavond rond 19:00 uur aan de Prinses Beatrixstraat in Ridderkerk een 40-jarige man uit Ridderkerk aangehouden voor computervredebreuk. Deze man had door een vergissing van de politie onbedoeld toegang gekregen tot vertrouwelijke politiedocumenten. Toen deze man gevorderd werd hier afstand van te doen, gaf de man hier geen gehoor aan. Hij gaf aan hier pas gehoor aan te geven als hij hier iets voor terug zou krijgen. Daarom is besloten de man aan te houden, zijn woning te doorzoeken en de vertrouwelijke bestanden weer veilig te stellen om mogelijke verspreiding te voorkomen. De politie heeft melding gemaakt van het datalek en doet onderzoek.

On Thursday evening around 7:00 PM, police arrested a 40-year-old man from Ridderkerk on Prinses Beatrixstraat in Ridderkerk for computer hacking. Due to a police error, the man had inadvertently gained access to confidential police documents. When ordered to relinquish these documents, he refused. He stated that he would only comply if he received something in return. Therefore, the decision was made to arrest the man, search his home, and secure the confidential files to prevent possible dissemination.

  • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.comEnglish
    1·
    2 hours ago

    This is an translated excerpt from the article:

    The man decided to download the files. Police told the man to stop this and delete the files. The man indicated that he would only stop and renounce it if he ‘would get something in return’. Therefore, the police have decided to arrest the man and confiscate his data carriers to secure the files again and prevent distribution.

    If you are sent a download link, while you know you should get an upload link, it is clearly told not to download and choose to download the files anyway, then you may be guilty of computer breach. The recipient can reasonably assume that the download link and the files shared with it are not intended for him.

    The police have no indication that the files are further distributed. The protocol surrounding a data breach is followed. Police are conducting further investigations.

    It does not seem like a power imbalance allows them to just roll up and arrest him. It seems like they have a legal ability to ask him to remove the files and since he did not they have a legal right to charge him/confiscate the files. I generally don’t want to assume public sentiment, but I personally think it’s understandable that some government documents (those pertaining to open investigations) are subject to protections that other documents might not be. For what it’s worth, if someone sent me their digital information they wouldn’t have to ask me to delete it because I would not have saved it in the first place and I certainly would not have asked for payment to delete it if I somehow accidentally downloaded it.