Hacker News.

Late-night host Stephen Colbert accused his network, CBS, of refusing to broadcast his interview with Texas Rep. James Talarico, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate, during Monday night’s airing of “The Late Show” for fear of running afoul of the Trump administration.

Colbert said CBS canceled Talarico’s appearance on air in light of guidance issued Jan. 21 by Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr, which directed daytime and late-night TV talk show hosts to offer equal airtime to all political candidates running for a given office. Talk shows have long been exempted from these “equal time” rules when conducting “bona fide news interviews,” allowing them to book political candidates without bringing on their opponents.

Talarico “was supposed to be here, but we were told in no uncertain terms by our network’s lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast,” Colbert said in a segment explaining the cancelation. “Then I was told in some uncertain terms that not only could I not have him on, I could not mention me not having him on. And because my network clearly doesn’t want us to talk about this, let’s talk about this.”

The interview was set to air on Monday night’s show the day before the start of early voting for Texas’ March 3 primaries. Talarico is vying for the Senate Democratic nomination against U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Dallas.

  • frazw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Banning something is a sure fire way to give it oxygen. Streisand effect

    The problem Trump has in doing this type of suppression is that it gains more attention and riles people up more than if he had let the interview air. Sure the interview might have said things he didn’t want to be said, but now he has made this a much bigger issue and he looks weak because he is scared at the mere prospect of some words being uttered.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      Banning something is a sure fire way to give it oxygen.

      Depends. Stephen says he was told not to tell anyone on air that they couldn’t air it. Assuming that’s true, and he had decided to comply, no one really would have known. It’s only through his (presumed) bravery that we’ve all seen it.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        I’m sure there would have been articles asking why there was an interview uploaded to the YouTube channel and pinned right at the top that wasn’t aired on the channel. It wouldn’t have been under the radar either way, but it would have taken longer to be reported this widely.

        But I do get your point.

      • frazw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        32 minutes ago

        Well not taking anything from him, but with so many people involved in a TV production I think it would have come out in some form that dissent was being suppressed.

    • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yep, and Colbert has no reason to pull any punches either. They already canceled his show to appease the administration. Why would Stephen hesitate to tell the world every time CBS bends the knee?

      Good on him for calling out every time they act as state propaganda and not a news network.

      • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If they cancel the show earlier they can’t pretend to be impartial, and Colbert gets paid the rest of his contract without having to do any work.

        Plus they’ll be in the real news for a week lol

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Same

        And, in hindsight, I’m glad I did. That guy has the right idea.

        He said ‘It’s not left vs right, it’s top vs bottom’.

        Exactly what we need our politicians to be acknowledging

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          No wonder the Trump regime didn’t want it aired. Nothing is more dangerous to them than pointing out that the culture war is fabricated to distract from the class war so the poors don’t realize that the billionaires are their enemies, not immigrants and trans people.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Banning something is a sure fire way to give it oxygen.

      It’s a clever bit of marketing to queue this up and make a big stir and drum about being censored.

      The allegations feel… thin? This is a primary race in a state that’s been sandbagged for Republicans for decades. But as a piece of campaign material, it’s par excellance. More people are going to see the clip passed around online than ever would watching it broadcast on a Monday night.

      The problem Trump has in doing this type of suppression

      I doubt this was anyone’s serious intent. Republicans pull this gag all the time. They deliberately try and trick the alarm for censorship and then scream ten times as loud “LOOK AT ME! I’VE BEEN CENSORED! CHECK OUT THE VIDEO THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE!”

      Liberals (or, at least, this one guy fighting for his life in a deep red state) finally seem to have caught up to the game.