• Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      So you didn’t even read it before writing a diatribe accusing me of supporting things I absolutely don’t. It literally says in the fucking bill that you just input it into the device.

      Provide an accessible interface at account setup that requires an account holder to indicate the birth date or age of the user of that device to provide a signal regarding the user’s age bracket (age signal) to applications available in a covered application store;

      • paul@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah because the American police state will be perfectly happy with you only providing a date. You’re going to wake up soon to a world you don’t understand, if you don’t start paying attention.

        • Feyd@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Look man, if it’s a good solution it’s a good solution. You’re attacking things that haven’t been proposed (by the bill in the OP).

          I actually don’t think legislation in a US state is a good way to create a technology standard so I wouldn’t like to see this pass, but it’s honestly the best way that I’ve seen to provide age verification for websites.

          It puts the onus on the parents to set the date correctly and takes it off of businesses to comply by doing it themselves where privacy is definitely at risk. If this is what was implemented it would not harm privacy and it would defang the “protect the children” arguments they constantly use to justify completely destroying privacy.

          You can rant and rage until you’re red in the face, but those are the facts.