• shininghero@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I mean, yeah? You give anything a connection to a global network with billions of people, and there will always be a chance for it to be exploited. Hell, even my personal OpenVPN instance for remotely accessing my home servers has to fend off attacks.

    This is why my next vehicle will be a slate truck. Zero internet connectivity by default, and updates can be done via USB-C from a phone (which can be vetted as needed).

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The whole internet of things was a mistake. I say that as one of the biggest tech enthusiasts I know.

      Secure software is mathematically possible, but secure engineering is mathematically improbable.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Internet of Things is a terrible no good idea, but Intranet of Things has some potential. Entirely local mesh networks like Zigbee and Z-wave solve most of your problems, doubly so if you properly confine their controllers into their own non Internet routable subnets.

        It’s honestly my biggest complaint with the Matter standard, it has Internet bridging baked into the design while the prior standards made that completely optional.

        • unmagical@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Parts of Iot are great, but not the whole “smart home sending multiple video and microphone feeds to Amazon/Google/Facebook” thing.

          The ability to set up remote sensors on critical infrastructure to give early alerts is a benefit.