PugJesus@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoHow can a national military surrender STYLE for standardization!?lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down15
arrow-up1121arrow-down1external-linkHow can a national military surrender STYLE for standardization!?lemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33·5 months agoBullpups look cool, regardless of practicality.
minus-squareSSTF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoIt’s easy to be an arms dealer when the writer decides you simply have the better weapon. Somehow 5.56 out of a carbine at point blank range can’t penetrate armor that an MP5 and then a P90 can.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoThe Famas is being retired though. It was fine but expensive.
Bullpups look cool, regardless of practicality.
“This is a weapon of war”
It’s easy to be an arms dealer when the writer decides you simply have the better weapon. Somehow 5.56 out of a carbine at point blank range can’t penetrate armor that an MP5 and then a P90 can.
The Famas is being retired though. It was fine but expensive.