Gotta bring over his fan group, all those sofas he promised to travel the world

Plus software seems to be dropping 32bit support. While I usually appreciate the benefits of 64 bit architecture, that’s uncalled for on most of the things I’d use RPi for

The loophole is that “antiques” are exempted from safety regulations.

I thought I remembered seeing something about an explicit ban a year or so, but trying to find it I see state level registration bans

I have obscure tastes, LoL. Actually I found it most difficult to explain the science and technology background of Nemo to the uninitiated - people just know him as the guy with the submarine but the car and other tech were right in line with the character

Google finds a lot of responses saying it has generally been possible

1. You need to provide evidence that the vehicle meets U.S. federal safety and emissions standards.
2. But safety and emissions standards have generally been harmonized between us and Canada.

So you can currently buy a car in Canada for the us because passing Canadian requires is proof that it satisfies American requirements. Protectionism does not currently matter but you’d need to cover tariffs. Maybe that will remain true, at least temporarily

Maybe wait 20 years , figure out what loophole allowed a handful of Kei trucks to be imported.

At that point even 20 year old car tech might be more advanced than what we’d be saddled with

What if I goto penn station with my pocket knife and scratch into the tile “Trump is a pedophile”? His name would be on penn station so he’s always be remembered for his deeds!

Ouch. I liked that movie and always wanted a sequel

That moxie can be thrown into mount doom and incinerated

Yes, but also I’m not convinced they haven’t done so by voter suppression. I’ve seen a lot fewer articles on that and that may not be part of voter fraud invests. There continue to be way too many attempts to suppress votes. How do you even count how many votes didn’t happen?

And it only needs to happen in swing states. You combine that with gerrymandering and it doesn’t have to prevent many voters to make a difference

I’m sure it doesn’t matter what party you register as, but this is purely racist.

They’re not saying they’ll interfere with elections but they may kidnap anyone who looks like an undocumented immigrant who shouldn’t vote. Generally that’s been people with brown skin.

As a white person who is registered Democrat, I wouldn’t be worried at all. However if I were Hispanic or otherwise not obviously white, I sure as hell would be, and may decide I can’t risk voting

This is exactly what Black Panthers tried to solve half a century ago

I can picture it, just like Red Dawn, but updated with the new threat to society

GO, WOLVERINES!

At least Scouts teach firearm safety, which clearly ICE skipped in their rush to terrorize neighborhoods

You create a great story but violates K.i.S.S.

• not saying they got in means they can’t use it as evidence. Sometimes there’s still due process
• even if they can get into lockdown mode, it’s clearly harder than not lockdown. Why conspire to make it harder?

Nah she’s playing with fire. Maybe she “don’t talk gud “, but this is a favorite talking point of deniers. This is exactly the scenario of dismissing BLM concerns with “all lives matter”. Technically true but offensively misleading

Is she right? Sure, anyone can be racist, no demographic has a monopoly only on that. All lives should matter

But she’s absolutely wrong to bring it up in this scenario, it’s another case of “both sides the same”, or a what aboutism. She’s effectively dismissing their concerns

What protests are you going to? The overwhelming majority of people I know who goto protests are white and no one has had such a complaint (yes I don’t have a diverse acquaintance group). Yes I’m white Middle Aged Christian male, ticking all the boxes except “sociopath”, and I’ve always felt welcome

I especially note the BLM protests from a few years ago, as predominantly darker skin people, but I still never felt anything but welcome

That’s not a typical occurrence.

The reality is that most people have insurance coverage, even if the cost is excessive, paperwork is excessive and there are too many coverage exceptions. And most people never encounter corporate death panels.

This is yet another “us vs them” scenario. Enough voters can say “at least I have better coverage than ….” That there is less pressure to fix it and too many people afraid of losing what they have.

Personally I have decent enough insurance (while I’m employed) that I would likely lose on universal coverage. However I’m aware of the total cost to myself and my employer, which is entirely obscene, and I realize it’s contingent on being employed, in an industry known for regular layoffs. I’m part of the problem since I’m “good enough” to not push for better, but also the solution since I would vote for universal coverage because I’m not a sociopath nor an idiot

We’ve learned to expect a huge range of gibberish, but please tell me this is @[email protected]

Realistically, not only do I not want an 8k tv, but I might not get a tv at all, if I had to do it today. We rarely watch tv anymore. The brainrot is the same but we’re much more likely to use individual screens

I want a dumb tv with the price and and specs of a smart tv. Less is more