The principle of copyleft is that you can’t encourage a free environment without some level of militantism. If you accept user hostile software like Steam alongside copyleft applications, then you’re fighting on the side of that hostility, on the side of theft and oppression.

Many newer popular FOSS softwares advocates stronger for libertarianism than collective protection, but it’s the strictly libre software that has been the backbone historically.

Users benefit from software, not from other users. Non-FOSS software already exists, and would exist without libre initiatives.

Do you think more users, even if apolitical or incidental will best increase the amount of quality FOSS software being written in the long run, or a smaller but principled and politically motivated user base? Will no-strings free-to-use softwares encourage more new FOSS software or a treasure trove of existing quality libraries that can only be used if you agree to stop oppressing the user?

If we use Valve as a case-study, then they have taken freely available software and created a product out of it. They have contributed back to that software, and because of their contribution Windows-emulation is now better for FOSS users. But they haven’t made any of their previous products less oppressive. They created a Linux-product to escape Microsoft’s power over them, and their business is charging rent from all game developers. Compared to almost anyone else, they have very little to loose by making their products user respecting and FOSS. They didn’t chose to do this. Would they have had, if the work they appropriated to create the Steamdeck software had even more militant terms of use?

Only because Google doesn’t index Chinese sites =P Deepseek had an access control bug when it first launched and Qwen is owned by Jack Ma.

GPUs being able to spy on you is a problem. Linux and OSs should work on ways to minimise this possibility. But specifically worrying about them ratting you out to the CPC is in my opinion much less serious than spying on you for commercial interests. Ultimately it’s possible to avoid visiting China if you aren’t Chinese. Including Chinese websites.