But I was told the democrats were the morally superior choice! How could the morally superior choice reject helping families and the poor?!

How could the morally superior choice capitulate to the framing brought forth by someone getting money from the person who is supposed to be your mortal enemy? That doesn’t seem morally superior to me!

This is what you get when you vOtE bLuE nO mAtTeR wHo

Do you think that America doesn’t do similar shit on an infinitely larger scale? Because we do. Fuck paying for a crowd, WE OVERTHROW DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED LEADERS.

So they’re just going to fill it with Hitler’s world view, got it.

Typical and expected.

So what do you call someone who actually thinks that it will get cut in the current politics of today?

A dumbass?

An idiot?

A big ol’ dork?

Well good thing it will never happen. ☺️

Imagine trying to undo thousands and thousands of years of evolution surrounding…. Earth’s gravity.

But you go ahead and fantasize about us destroying all the planets in the universe. After all; we’re the only thing destroying ours.

We shouldn’t be building rockets PERIOD. They cost too much and are eventually only going to serve trillionaires.

FIX SHIT ON THE GROUND FIRST

That said,

They did a test from 300 meters, sure it’s cool but I think they have a LONG way to go before they are competetive.

Was there even any cohesive message other than, “America doesn’t have kings”? I didn’t see one. Sure, it rallied people together, but to do what?

We need an actual leader. Someone or something with consistency. Protest are good, but a day isn’t enough. We need a plan and a strategy.

Right now it’s just a fucking mess.

I’m trying to understand your point, but I’m a little lost here.

Do you mean the way the public reacted to their ad?

Or the way they capitulated to that reaction?

I mean: Yes racism and sexism are pervasive in our society, but using Ben and Jerry’s (operating under the same racism/sexism) as an example; they do heavy marketing tactics toward LGBTQ but they are also an ally.

Does them utilizing that make them bad?

Can something be good and also a marketing tactic?

Even if this is true, I don’t think they’re going to find the number of votes to change any outcome. Didn’t Trump win by like 3 million votes? Maybe this could have flipped an electoral college vote, but would that have even mattered?

If they are using the data that has been perpetuating this for a while now, they don’t have a single source for the percentage given.

It does say NEW STUDY though, so I could be wrong.

I recently watched a YouTube video about this exact percentage, I’ll try to find it and link it.

I think it’s also good to remember that, creators who bake in their sponsorships are USUALLY paid upfront for the space.

Meaning, just skip that shit if it’s not for you. They already got the money.

At least, this is how I have come to understand sponsorships.

In what world is the president going to illegally use the military to kill a billionaire?

They have the CIA for that.

What they are doing right now is performative things that will have absolutely no effect on anything. They’re already doing it, and you’re defending it.

My mom is obsessed with grok

I told her to use ChatGPT instead

I’m tired

These things need tires.

Tires are rubber.

Texas has a lot of guns.

You got the strangle part right.

I wonder how people in the Middle East feel about Call of Duty.

Imagine getting thousands of kids addicted to gambling, while people still sing your praises. Cool world, cool people 👍🏼