

You’re giving him too much credit. His motives are:
-
get richer
-
have people kiss his ass so he can feel like a big boy
That’s it.
You’re giving him too much credit. His motives are:
get richer
have people kiss his ass so he can feel like a big boy
That’s it.
Real anti-Israel or just anti-genocide?
Next say it to his face during one of the so called interviews.
The point is to limit time spent using Windows. Some people can take it down to 0%, others can’t. Spending 10% less time on Windows still let’s you learn about Linux and try different things. In couple of years you could change jobs or software and make it 50% Linux, then 90%… Not switching because you can’t immediately make it 0% windows, 100% Linux is basically saying “I would switch but it would require effort on my side and would be inconvenient”.
And yes, you’re right, it doesn’t make you lazy, sorry for that. It just means that you’re not really that bothered by using Windows and avoiding it is not worth the effort for you. It’s fine, just be honest about it.
About 20 years ago I would handle my email, IRC, watching movies and web browsing on Linux and each time I wanted to play Counter Strike I would reboot and switch to windows. After I was done with CS I would boot back to Linux. People who say they can’t use Linux because X doesn’t work there are just lazy.
No, it’s useless. Put your energy somewhere else like Linux phones.
Agree with everything (especially the 10 x 500kW > 6 x 1MW part), I’m not saying building out the infrastructure will not happen, I’m just saying that it will be difficult and what I see in real world is far from the ideal you’re describing. On any longer travel I have to pass through low travel areas. Entering cities to charge is impractical because getting in and out can take 0.5-1h. The chargers are still unreliable so planning a longer route is not easy. I have to carefully check the chargers maps, looking at the distances between each charger and possible backups. 99% of people are not going to do this. Until a big. reliable network of fast chargers exists they will just stick to gasoline cars (or protest if you force them to switch). And building such networks is a slow and expensive.
I see couple other problems:
The charging times are not about how long do you have to wait while your car is charging but how many cars can you charge at peak hours. Last Easter in Spain there were huge lines to the charges because everyone was driving at the same time and there were simply not enough chargers. 5 min vs 10 min charging means the line is moving twice as fast.
Ionity has 300kW chargers in Spain but there are pretty rare. 50kW-100kW is most common here. Rolling out 1MW network will be very slow due to all the infrastructure it requires and judging by the prices of 150kW chargers, charging at 1MW speeds will probably be more expensive than gasoline. But in the end that’s the only way to actually replace gasoline cars so they will have to build it eventually. My guess would be 10-15 years before you can reliably (as in network big enough that you can easily find working chargers) charge at those speeds.
Interesting, I’ve found this quote:
“Unlike regular EV chargers, these new high-powered units can’t simply be installed anywhere, as they demand substantial electrical capacity to operate at full capacity. They may require more direct access to high-voltage mains, limiting their deployment to locations with robust grid infrastructure.”
I thought getting a 1MW connection to the grid is pretty much impossible for a charger. I wander if we’re going to see this in Europe.
Charging this fast is always battery to battery, right? Any idea how many cars can the BYD charger charge before going back to a normal speed (i.e. getting power from the grid)?
WTF? Just download it for free.
Do they play Russian anthem?
Yes, what I need is even more noise pollution.
Yeah, I don’t understand why this guy is basing this on some monthly counts. Start google maps, see how long the route is, see what odometer is showing, check it again after arriving at the destination.
I think the whole point of Paint and Notepad is that they are installed by default. They are there to give you the most basic functionality MS can offer without charging you extra. Now they are simply trying to get some extra money by funneling users to AI/MS 365.
I guess things like covers, phone cases, mugs, stickers, magnets, frames or anything made out of wood, leather and so on. Probably something you would make for clients, not for yourself.
What if you set out with the idea of starting socialist utopia on a new planet and get there to find booming corporate dystopia?
I don’t have cheese.