

Thanks
Thanks
Availability of Video Games (originally released before 2010) is approximately 13 percent, slightly above pre-World War II audio recordings (10 percent or less) and below the survival rate of American silent films (14 percent).
These are fascinating numbers, do you have a source?
I think you forgot the link text?!
They are just joking about not having friends but the “in the manner it was originally intended” is particularly relevant for dedicated co-op titles.
There a more games released now than ever, there are also more coop campaigns than ever.
https://www.co-optimus.com/games.php?campaign=true&playerCount=2
This site doesn’t seem to let me link to more specific filters but if you set release year to 2024 and choose a specific platform they list 214 PC titles, 128 Switch titles, 124 PS5 titles, and 97 Xbox Series titles from last year !
Edit: its a weird site, it wasn’t applying all the filters in the link it generated. So I’ve simplified the link and summarised the numbers.
Title is accurate!
Nintendo has a lot of active “super mario” trademarks with the USPTO, 79259975 includes the following:
G & S: IC 030: Tea; tea-based beverages; coffee; coffee-based beverages; cocoa; cocoa-based beverages; pastries; candy; ice cream; cookies; chocolate; popcorn; chewing gum; bread; buns; sandwiches; pizzas; pies; cakes; frozen yogurt confections; pancakes; crackers; mints for breath freshening; seasonings; ketchup; dressings for salad; cereal bars; oatmeal; corn flakes; noodles; pasta sauce.
https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/search
This would limit the supermarket from carrying their own store brand product lines for these product types.
Off the top of my head I can confirm my supermarket stocks their own brand of :
Tea; coffee; cocoa; pastries; candy; ice cream; cookies; chocolate; bread; buns; pies; cakes; seasonings; dressings for salad; cereal bars; oatmeal; corn flakes; pasta sauce.
Admittedly my local is part of a large chain so this may not be typical but even independent supermarkets in my area tend to repackage bulk candies and chocolate under their own label.
An account for PlayStation Network will become optional for these titles on PC.
This is very explicitly not making any promises beyond these 4 titles. :\
I’ve lost track, is Helldiver’s 2 still PSN optional but still unavailable in non-PSN regions?
It looks like Rolling Stone included Baulders Gate 3.
That game is recent enough that it hasn’t qualified for Wikipedia’s List of video games considered the best yet.
Wikipedia’s list requires an entry feature on 6 different publications’ “best of” lists so that implies RS may have applied some and haven’t just cribbed directly.
Edit:
For anyone else interested it looks like RS was the 6th list including these three titles so they have now been added over on Wikipedia:
I’m a little shocked THPS wasn’t already there.
Tablet as a display and a controller sounds like a workable solution.
It sounds dangerous.
Don’t you need the playerbase to attract and retain the whales?
This gamesindustry.biz article is offering less info and context than the press release it is cribbed from.
I’ve never heard of EFGAMP, have they weighed in on the Stop Killing Games campaign?
If two platforms share compatibility then developers can choose to target the weaker system and release on both.
For some games this might involve a bit of compromise and cause resentment with the owners of the more powerful system, but for other (simple) games it might not involve any compromise at all.
Either way there are a lot of Switch consoles in the wild and there will be some publisher support for the Switch for a few years yet.
As an example from the other side of the fence ps4 is still getting titles:
I just had a look at their offer and it has a few issues.
https://help.robotcache.com/hc/en-us/articles/360029179691-Resale-Policy
So they keep 75% of resale revenue, the purchaser doesn’t see any discounts, and it can’t be used to access delisted games?
Its a bit of a monkey paw.
Any platform that offers transferable digital licenses will get a lot of customer loyalty but is likely to have mainstream publishers boycott it.
It could be structured so that everybody wins e.g. the purchaser pays less than the “new” price, with their payment then split as cash for the original publisher and store credit for the seller.
That way:
As a customer I would find that attractive but I think most publishers would consider it a slippery slope.
It seems SKG = Stop Killing Games.
I hadn’t seen the acronym before.
unless they have a real reason for this new one lol
If they spin this so gen10 Xbox games don’t have to offer feature parity on Series S that will please a few people.
Looks like there has been an update
TLDW?
Ouch