

10·
1 month agoThis seems to be a strategic engagement inducing comment but I’ll bite.
One additional piece of obvious information will probably adjust initial impressions of the above comment. So Harris “won” 20 states and Trump 30… so using some napkin math and by looking at that statement on it’s surface (I noticed you didn’t actually make a claim one way or the other) that means… Harris states, on average, generate roughly 30% more GDP than Trump states.
Edit: Punctuation
Edit Edit: Harris is 19 + DC and Trump 31 so it’s actually closer to 32-34% (If you count DC or not).
I too, am curious. I could totally be on board with this comment, or I could totally not be on board with this comment. I do agree with the latter sentiment. There are some very creative and well thought-out systems out there.