This legacy of conditional aid is neocolonial at its core: It enforces dependency while maintaining the illusion of benevolence.

Absolutely.

Yes and I hope people are waking up to the fact that liberal isn’t left, nor neoliberal, and socially left neo/lib also isn’t left.

I guess I’m remembering leaked tapes from HRC’s private banker fundraiser.

I noticed that, and that it’s a private fundraiser. Ok. When will the DNC actually stop shutting out the voices of the ones who miss needed working hours to vote for your candidate–or not.

I’m thinking of citizens filing complaints about emerald mine nepo babies and models on genius visas

https://archive.is/iJi1v

The government can only do this in specific situations. It must prove someone “illegally procured” citizenship by not meeting the requirements, or that they lied or hid important facts during the citizenship process.

Civil suit. Can anyone file a complaint?

Just because something is funny doesn’t mean I agree/disagree.

This kind of pro bono work could skyrocket a young, talented, obscure lawyer’s career!

Isn’t Bluetooth easy to intercept?

I would search that system on my own, tbh.

The BMA said its opposition to Palantir’s involvement in the NHS was a matter of good governance, not ideology. “If Palantir’s software is being used to target individuals in immigration enforcement and is being deployed in active conflict zones, then that’s completely incompatible with the values we uphold in the delivery of care,” said Dr David Wrigley, the deputy chair of the BMA’s general practitioners committee. He warned patients would be alarmed and could choose to withhold information from their doctor if they did not trust the organisation processing their data or there were fears about what the data might be used for. The Liberal Democrat MP Martin Wrigley said the interoperability between the data systems Palantir provides for health and defence was “profoundly worrying”. The Conservative MP Kit Malthouse wanted to know if a military could target particular individuals with particular characteristics by using Palantir’s ability to process a large pool of data. Mosley said: “We provide an enormous amount of control and governance to the organisations that use our software for that purpose to manage precisely the kind of risks that you’re talking about.” Malthouse said: “That sounds like a yes”.

“Food security is more than having something to eat: It’s the comfort of knowing that by not having to worry about food, you can focus on your future,” she added.

I’m guessing the architects of the bill are fully aware of this and the bill acheives the actual goal. They want a desperate, schismed populace for a guaranteed supply of easily exploitable wage and chattel slaves.

Ultrawealthy do.

I’m extremely interested. Perhaps somewhere on a niche instance?

Perhaps a post about this in politics? You’ve piqued my interest.

Probably won’t have to pay. They’re appealing.

I came with the same excerpt as your first.

I disagree with the bit about the king, though, because like the monarchy of the UK, he’s largely there to force us to bow to the jackal and vulture gods of capitalism. Now we have a choice. Will we sacrifice ourselves and children to those false gods, or make the necessary choice of perhaps more difficult sacrifices to the more merciful egalitarian ideals? We may never realize them, in any lifetime. I suppose that largely depends on how much the collective values themselves over capitalists.

I feel it’s necessary to point out a lot of these farmers are contacted to major brands, both food and pest control, who take the majority of profit, often leaving the farmers themselves without much.