MaggiWuerze

Lol, great idea. Let’s see if they can make it as good as Vampire Survivors (which was clearly the inspiration)

I was sure this had to be satire… Oh boy

What damage? Its been known for years what a scummy company Nintendo is and people still buy their games and consoles in the millions. The fans will just say that Nintendo is in the right and move on

I mean, yeah… On the other hand it shouldn’t really edit a link you want to share, should it?

You mean constantly displaying sexuality as evil and interest in it as sinful leads to a unhealthy sexuality? Say it ain’t so

It actually had Denuvo removed in August it seems

You’re exactly the kind of Jellyfin user the rest has to thank for the devs lax approach to security. If you actually demanded even basic security, the devs would maybe at least consider it a priority.

But until it no longer provides an unsecured API, you should maybe think about whether you want to portrait it as secure.

Jellyfin holds no sensible data.

Maybe if you don’t live in a country where piracy is actively prosecuted

And Plex is not easier to install and secure than Jellyfin.

You can literally start a Plex server from a exe on desktop windows. Don’t make a fool out of yourself.

Also it is immensely more secure, unless with “Jellyfin” you actually mean “Jellyfin plus a myriad of convoluted extra steps every user has to take by themselves since the devs can’t be arsed to follow basic standards for web security”

My comment, that you answered first to, was about the way the Jellyfin devs would not react the same way to a security incidence, since they do not care about it (or at least don’t see it as important).

Also, the decentralized nature of Jellyfin does not mitigate such attacks, since you don’t need the users credentials to begin with

I don’t mean to come across as confrontational, but, maybe stop defending it then? You can keep using and liking the software while still holding the devs accountable for what is basic modern web security.

If all the Jellyfin users I saw acknowledging the issues actually stopped acting like it was a non issue, maybe the Jellyfin devs would do something about it.

Which is the exact mindset that enables Jellyfin devs to not fix those issues, congratulations

Yeah, me as well. I have a Jellyfin configured and ready to go, but since I share my Plex with a lot of users, half of whom would be turned off by the need of a vpn, I won’t switch until they’ve sorted their shit out.

and more about there being no effort made to make Jellyfin secure.

That’s exactly it. And I feel the devs found that their users don’t care or will even defend it, so they won’t tackle it and avoid the problems that come with a rewrite of parts of their api. Plex gets flag for not adding quality of life features people want for the media player, but Jellyfin gets a pass for actual security issues.

Love you for still trying. I don’t know how often I’ve written the same comment. They simply don’t care.

Good luck getting a similar reaction to the myriad of security issues Jellyfin has

How do you think DDG ‘skips the SEO stuff’? They don’t have their own index, they are a meta search engine and the indices they rely on are subject to SEO efforts of the various pages

Its about sending the takedown request in the first place, not the company complying with it. Its an entirely, automated process with no regard to validity

It was broadly assumed, since it was a welcome boost for them, but it was never confirmed

Don’t forget, that the password is written on the bottom, so its visible when they fly above you

Ode an die Freude starts playing in the background

Yeah, let’s change nothing about how we make it impossible or incredibly unattractive for young people to have kids, while also not allowing immigration and instead do… checks notes something with AI