TBH that happens when there is enough RAM available. I’d be surprised if the usage didn’t get go down under memory pressure.

*his poverty, right

Awww, Windows. You can mitigate that by using a PIN on bitlocker drive. Possibly.

Edit: also more secure with security keys: https://www.yubico.com/works-with-yubikey/catalog/secure-disk-for-bitlocker/

Not in absolute terms :)

Ditto. Also insanely configurable.

Try mikrotik

Can it be a BIOS/UEFI setting that disk is hot swappable? I vaguely remember similar issue on Windows. If that’s the case, try setting it as not hot swappable in BIOS/UEFI.

It’s still roughly half of the NMC. I wonder what’s the charging speed.

Yep

The price 🤯👀

It’s unlikely you will see a car powered by those in near future if ever as they have relatively low density. But you’ll definitely see those as home battery and such where size/density doesn’t matter that much. And I bet it’s less inflammable as well.

Edit: ha, I stand corrected, there are cars powered by these but don’t expect huge range.

On MacOS is UMT/Qemu.

Not so smart afterall, eh?

SELinux doesn’t help much when it comes to desktop apps. AFAIK it’s more geared towards server apps and its configuration is complicated. At least that’s my impression.

You are right, GPG signing is good as well. But in both cases you still have unsigned apps.

What security problems do you think package managers are vulnerable to? If the upstream repo is compromised all bets are off regardless of the system.

Yep. And in such case an antivirus software might come handy.

Even package managers are vulnerable to many security problems - can they guarantee that apps are not infected either directly or indirectly (through a library)? There is also flathub. Windows have also an option to verify apps through certificates which isn’t the case with Linux AFAIK. If you want to stay safe on Windows to some degree you can, but the real problem IMO is that Windows is hugely more used and run by less technical persons. 🤷‍♂️

Security: Linux doesn’t need antivirus, just don’t install infected software. Riiiight? Sorry, but this is silly.

deleted by creator

From what I read so far, hardware key is just another way to decrypting, not the required. So it’s just a convenient method to avoid typing a (long) password and instead just few PIN chars. So, if somebody gets hold of password, can still decrypt the disk even without the hardware key. Not perfect, but still better than only password.

Yes, currently I’m using my brain for that and was thinking a security key such as Yubikey with touch requirement + PIN. But at least on Linux there is no support for that, or is it?

Edit: Ha, there actually is - https://mhdez.com/posts/unlocking-encrypted-linux-with-a-yubikey/