Super interesting report. I’m a fan of AI but it clearly demonstrates how careful we need to be and that instructions are not a reliable way (as anyone should know by now).

To be fair, that’s the lowest executive salary I’ve seen in a looong time.

Many people on Lemmy are extremely negative towards AI which is unfortunate. There are MANY dangers, but there are also Many obvious use cases where AI can be of help (summarizing a meeting, cleaning up any text etc.)

Yes, the wax how these models have been trained is shameful, but unfoet9tjat ship has sailed, let’s be honest.

Oh yeah, Endomondo brings back memories. Let’s see what’s next for Garmin, though this is not a good sign. Unfortunately, there’s no real alternatives out there if you consider batters life.

Hate this marketing, player-centric advertising platform is an oxymoron.

Wow, the Optimus keyboard, I so wished it ever became mainstream.

Cool to see a possible replacement for Arc coming up now that The Browser Company put it aside. I loved it’s way of kind of forcing you to use a single window, but multiple instances of it, as well as Little Arc. Will keep monitoring Zen to see how it develops.

Wow, that was a really extensive but insightful article.

The sad part is, even if the next government is going to be more open-minded again, it is doubtful whether they’d want to spend the effort to reintroduce all of the content, solutions etc.

lol. Sad but true.

Who the fuck cares? 😦

Using it for four years or so, very happy with it.

I find Flow fantastic for discovering new songs.

What the hell are you taking about? Get out of your bubble.

Interesting, and shameful, didn’t know that.

Tell me this isn’t corruption.

Sad but true. Intel’s performance was poor over the last year. Shuddering thinking about my Mac with Intel CPU, there must be burn victims from this thing. Still, less competition is never a good thing.

Agree. It is unfortunate however, that when being impossibly rich and protected for the rest of your life, you still work on how to squeeze the most out of humanity instead of focusing on something greater.

Agree, there’s a lot going on. How I see it:

• @xxx are snaps, limiting result to any resource from a website e.g. Wikipedia.com

• !xxx are bangs, using the sites own search engine to return results. They are external searches, and might provide more (if the site does not expose certain parts to search engine) or less (if the site didn’t build search capabilities for some parts but they are indexable) than snaps.

• Lenses return search results based on certain criteria. Those could be a list of snaps (so domains), but also geography, keywords, file types, or they could exclude the same.

Haha yeah, it looks like a fake picture or some cartoon.