Ya but it says what we want to hear

Wtf is this website? And this is WITH an ad blocker

Hospitals legally have to treat you in the US. Also people will only kick you out if they know you’re three (and care enough to). As a trucker, I’m sure he knew some spots.

I’ve made it 5 years without catching a ban from anywhere except some community on another instance for allegedly being anti-trans, but idk how they got that since I’m pro-trans

It was about whether Bitcoin Cash was referred to as “Bcash” or not.

I forget the semantics, but there were a lot of sources calling it Bcash, but then there were equally reliable sources saying that was only the name given by detractors. The war was something about how Bcash should be referenced in the opening paragraph

There’s a lot of problems with Wikipedia, but in my years editing there (I’m extended protected rank), I’ve come to terms that it’s about as good as it can be.

In all but one edit war, the better sourced team came out on top. Source quality discussion is also quite good. There’s a problem with positive/negative tone in articles, and sometimes articles get away with bad sourcing before someone can correct it, but this is about as good as any information hub can get.

Damn I’m surprised how confident he sounds about that

Seeing these paintings wants me to go back to a time I never lived

Right, because side-loading is called “installing” on Linux

https://molly.im/

Nah, not for suicide:

But in the post warning users that the company will call the authorities if they seem like they’re going to hurt someone, OpenAI also acknowledged that it is “currently not referring self-harm cases to law enforcement to respect people’s privacy given the uniquely private nature of ChatGPT interactions.”

Proton upstreams to Wine a lot. You can tell by the number of patches they have keeps fluctuating

I read most this article and don’t see how any of it is false or misinformation. Literally the first word in the page is “alleged”, and it’s full of arguments with linked citations from both sides

Wait, how is you providing evidence to back up your argument “doing work for others”?

JK we all know the answer … 🤡

Link or gtfo, let people check the sources themselves

Why wouldn’t they default to not accepting any AI generated content

If you can accurately detect what content is AI generated, you’ll have a company worth billions overnight

No, in this case autopilot never disengaged (but according to the article, it should have issued the warning and disengaged earlier)

Rare Australia W

There’s a lot of really bad slop on YouTube. Your algorithm might be curated to “documentaries”, but that’s far from the norm

Putting a title on it (I.e. “Big beautiful bill”) doesn’t mean it is a big, beautiful bill.

I’m not skeptical of DEI because I’m against “diversity, equity, and inclusion”, I’m skeptical because of piss poor implementations of it I see in the workforce