You cannot have equity without first enforcing equality. Otherwise equity just becomes spoiled entitled behavior.
Equality is absolute.
You cannot have equity without first enforcing equality. Otherwise equity just becomes spoiled entitled behavior.
Equality is absolute.
This comic seems out dated. Right now a lot more people are in a similar situation, regardless of ethnicity. The only ones at the top are those of the upper class.
Then there are the racists who are all below like everyone else, but in their unintelligence turn against their fellows.
The only ones at the top right now are the rich cunts who profit from ethnic and cultural divides.
Ok, but as far as I’m aware very few people, regardless of gender, take rejection well.
There’s nothing mature about enabling a person’s prejudices or delusions.
I for one like all of it being in one versatile device. My issue with smartphones isn’t technology, but the corpos that profit from you even after you’ve bought the phone.
Yes, and you have been patiently countered. You might not like it, but this comic is a fallacy. There’s nothing else to be said.
As it should be towards prejudice. If you were expecting anything else, you’re an asshole at best, a fascist at worst.
Victimised? XD
No, I’m calling out misandry.
I see absolutely nothing wrong invalidating someone with prejudice.
Somehow YOU DECIDED…
Comic: “Yup, about what I expected”.
There is no “a lot”.
This is missndry.
There will always be outlyers. But the “yup, about what I expected” at the end of the comic draws this behaviour as something universal you can just expect, which is simply untrue.
The number being high is just plain nonsense. Obviously everyone who has done dated will at least have met one such person. That a statistical inevitability.
Should I regard women as spoiled, entitled brats simply because I have happened to meet two or three in my life? Should I consider black people as untrustworthy, dirty swindlers because I met ONE who was?
Should I make a comic about how hypocritical all people are because I met a few that were nice, but also a few that just sucked?
If you have any rational bone in your body the obvious answer would be “no”.
What makes the comic believable and the other guy not?
Anyway, see my other posts about fallacies.
No, I believe this is a made up scenario created by a misandrist. The more I see this person’s comics the more I’m convinced.
So… What exactly are you comparing to the bear? The woman or the man?
As if this comic isn’t an anecdote by which the author judges everyone with.
Specific things that happen to people aren’t a problem. Having a message that literally says that specific thing is what always happens is not.
That could literally be anyone, yes, also women.
You can live your life permanently paranoid, or worse, paranoid with prejudice. Or you could grow up.
It requires some heads to role first. Some old dinosaurs still around are dragging the whole world down with them.