

Not in the abstract no, but I find the implication that someone who found Harris’s stance on Gaza to be a deal breaker is thusly responsible for empowering Trump to count for sure. As I detailed above I voted for her despite my misgivings, I felt it was practical and effective harm reduction under the circumstances and I stand by that decision, but I refuse to condemn someone who came to a different conclusion and I’m openly critical of those who do.
The Democrats need to stand for more than “we’re not Republicans”, and Harris muzzled a popular and progressive VP pick in favor of sprinting to the right to pick up some fabled middle voters. Then people act indignant that she lost the support of the left wing in the process.
I resent the implication which is often made, that by standing for one’s principles and refusing to support someone actively abetting a genocide one takes on responsibility for empowering the opponent, even if the opponent is objectively worse. And yeah Trump is worse, and by a lot it’s not even a fucking contest, including on Gaza but that still doesn’t make Harris or anyone else entitled to the votes of all Trump’s political opponents. If you’re selecting your candidate by who’s the least worse the result will be a race to the bottom and I’ve got all the respect in the world for those who put their foot down even though I chose a different response
Which is a valid position to take. I never intended to change anyone’s mind on what the right path was in 2024. For better and very much for worse we’re all in the same leaky ass boat and it’s going to take serious and sustained cross popular activism to keep us all from drowning. Harris Stans, hard line progressive Puritans, hell I’ll take remorseful Trumpets because at this point it’s more important to be doing damage control and repairs than it is to litigate who was responsible for getting us into this mess. To be clear I’m not suggesting you or most others in this thread are attempting to relitigate that, but I’ve seen an infuriating tendency to dismiss potential allies because something is “their fault” rather than doing the work of building a strong coalition. I’m of the opinion the only successful long term strategy is grassroots, pushing for principled candidates from all backgrounds who will follow through on their stated goals. Our first goal must be to stop the bleeding, but to heal the damage we MUST put a stop to the duoparty ratchet effect which has been pushing the US to the right for decades, and the only way to do that is to primary Dems from the left. To provide real and actionable solutions to the crises facing the US, and in a really fucked up way Trump has given this movement a generational opportunity. These idiots have shit the bed so hard they’ve created an opportunity for a seismic change in policy, and a corresponding appetite with swing voters.
I hope when you say you have no sympathy for those folks you’re speaking facetiously. I understand how you feel, but it makes me very sad. Not that you in isolation are feeling this way but that such a position is understandable in the first place. This is a messed up time