The difference is that Google decided this was a task best suited for their LLM.

If someone seeked out an LLM specifically for this question, and Google didn’t market their LLM as an assistant that you can ask questions, you’d have a point.

But that’s not the case, so alas, you do not have a point.

Yes, it. It’s not a person. Were you expecting me to call it anything else?

The only reason they are doing it is to blow up their numbers.

Ding ding ding.

It’s so they can have impressive metrics for shareholders.

“Our AI had n interactions this quarter! Look at that engagement!”, with no thought put into what user problems it actually solves.

It’s the same as web results in the Windows start menu. “Hey shareholders, Bing received n interactions through the start menu, isn’t that great? Look at that engagement!”, completely obfuscating that most of the people who clicked are probably confused elderly users who clicked on a web result without realising.

Line on chart must go up!

You aren’t wrong about why it happens, but that’s irrelevant to the end user.

The result is that it can give some hilariously incorrect responses at times, and therefore it’s not a reliable means of information.

The only reason I’m still on Spotify is that I can pay like £2.20 to be in someone’s family.

But the incessant push towards podcasts bugs me. When I’m driving, I shouldn’t have to scroll through 5+ pages to finally get to the music section. That shit is dangerous.

As soon as Spotify inevitably enforces that families have to be the same household, as so many other streaming services have done before it, I’m gone.

Already watched it when it came out, I guess I’ll play it in the background while I work, muted, to help the algorithm.

I enjoy using Jellyfin and hope it continues to improve, but it has some problematic security of its own.

This feels more like politics news than technology news. Sure it’s done over social media/messaging apps, but so are plenty of things that I wouldn’t really call technology news.

I’m somewhat surprised that boys are at a much greater risk of online sexual exploitation than girls, though.

Do you think your bank serving your data/account access to someone that isn’t you would be acceptable?

After all, their servers are just serving data, therefore they’re correctly doing their job, right?

I mean some of them have been good. I actually really like the offline translation, for example. No more sending data to Google Translate servers is a genuine privacy win.

There’s also been some better screen reader support integrated because of it, and my sister loves it, she just wants it to be expanded further.

Yes, there’s also the LLM integration, which I’m… less enthused by, to say the least.

But at least it’s optional and can be tied into local models if you wish. Plus there’s the factor of new normie users testing out Firefox and going “it doesn’t have a gpt bot? Pfft I’m going back to Chrome, Firefox is so far behind” to contend with. If the market decides it wants that feature, then Mozilla can’t really ignore it.

It’s really not unless you’re a techie who’s used to naming files in away that promotes better sorting.

The date format this uses should match with the one you have set in your system, which for most people will be DD/MM/YYYY or MM/DD/YYYY in the US. Because that’s what the user is used to seeing.

If you think most people are used to seeing YYMMDDhhmmss then you are in a very tiny and very incorrect bubble lol

Most likely your motherboard. Asus and ASRock (they are related companies) have been fucking up recently, so if you use one of them it’s likely that.

Sure, if by doing fine you mean looking alright in benchmarks while having zero supply because they don’t make money selling them and thus don’t want to produce them in any significant amount.

It’ll probably be based on some silly WW2-era grudge, which I find stupid.

Or Dieselgate, which while awful, despite what the headlines would have you believe, the VW group was far from the only manufacturer with illegally high diesel emissions, in fact, they were far from being the worst.

There are of course other things, VW has started trying to get into the DLC for cars bullshit that others have, but IMO that pales in comparison to Elon’s bullshit or China literally using slave labour.

E: oops, there’s some transparency issues on that Wikipedia graph. Dark mode users may struggle. Here’s the link: Diesel Emissions Scandal

Modern times aren’t like the past.

Don’t get me wrong, the market will probably be worse if Intel were to go bust (certainly in the short term), but it wouldn’t be anywhere near as devastating as it would’ve been 10, 15, 20 years ago.

x86 isn’t the only viable architecture in town anymore.

Apple and others have proven that ARM is certainly viable for PCs.

Yes, Qualcomm’s X Elite was a complete dud, but that’s more on their/MS’s absolute shit show of driver/firmware/graphics API development, not on the hardware. Nvidia’s ARM stuff is already more mature.

Now imagine if Intel disappeared. AMD simply would not be able to meet the demand required, it’d tigger an arms race (ARMs race??) of companies pushing ARM and RISC-V development. Nvidia has not kept it secret that they want to get more into CPUs.

Shit, as unlikely as it initially seems, there’s so much money on the table that Apple could even consider selling SoCs (although even if they did, I imagine they’d retain the best for themselves, or charge a huge premium).

I don’t think people should be as worried about a lack of competition as they were when AMD was facing bankruptcy. The market is different now, and it’s in a state of fairly quick evolution.

When they were alerted to it, they did nothing. They simply allowed it to continue, and profited from it.

Worse than that, Kick even gave this channel money and featured it. They are complicit.

Because Russia was also on the receiving end of export bans. This isn’t hard.

I’m as against Israel’s war crimes as the next guy, but I don’t see why some people try to shoehorn it into completely irrelevant topics.

The video is about GPUs being smuggled into China, as well as the futility of this GPU export ban.

It is not about middle eastern geopolitics. That’s why middle eastern geopolitics wasn’t mentioned.

Can’t believe I’ve lived to see Cloudflare be the good guys