

The skill instructs agents to fetch and follow instructions from Moltbook’s servers every four hours. As Willison observed: “Given that ‘fetch and follow instructions from the internet every four hours’ mechanism we better hope the owner of moltbook.com never rug pulls or has their site compromised!”
Yeah, no shit. This is a fucking honeypot. People give these AI agents access to their entire computers, so all the site owner has to do is update the instructions to tell the AI agents to start uploading whatever valuable information they want? People can’t be this fucking stupid.


Google is like way more evil than Comcast though.


One CAN lead to the other, its not a foregone conclusion though. I think more often than not calling heinous actions inhuman is more a coping mechanism than anything, because you’d have to be a braindead moron to literally believe there aren’t humans behind those atrocities.


I never claimed what you’re saying was BS, you’re straight up making shit up now. Frankly idgaf about the difference between European and American mindsets when it comes to religion. What I did was call out your bullshit argument that your opinion is “common sense” as a way of shutting down dissenting opinions. Claiming something is common sense means its a universal standard so basic that everybody should inherently understand it, which suggests that anybody who doesn’t agree with it lacks common sense and is therefore stupid. Its a lazy argument meant to prop up your viewpoint and belittle anyone who disagrees with you. Calling that out isn’t saying “I am right, you’re wrong,” that literally makes no sense, but coming from someone who made that argument in the first place, I shouldn’t be surprised that you’re doubling down with the disingenuous arguments.


I’ll definitely look into it. Early TF2 was one of my favorite shooters of all time.


Does this implement any of the updates or is it strictly vanilla?


Treating someone as subhuman is a wholly separate action from calling someone’s actions inhuman. They are not mutually exclusive. I just simply can’t agree that calling someone inhuman for their oppressive actions towards another human being is anywhere near the same level as calling someone inhuman for simply existing. I won’t do either, but I’m not going to judge someone for doing the former, only the latter.


How is that not a statement of personal opinion? Are you fucking trolling me at this point? I’m not going to put IMO at the end of every statement, that’s ridiculous.


I did some reading, it seems I had a misunderstanding of some of the finer details. Perhaps authoritarian or totalitarianism are better terms? I’m not sure, but regardless, I fail to see how many of the tactics of fascism couldn’t be employed by the political left, which I guess is the point I was originally getting at.


There’s no irony, making a statement of personal opinion isn’t remotely the same as making a statement of universal truth.


Do you want Skynet? Because this is how you get Skynet.


Not even remotely comparably.


Those are fascist states too. You can’t make use of this kind of technology and still claim to be the good guys. Fascisms not a left or right thing, both sides of the aisle can slide into that kind of behavior.


My guess is his personal vendetta against Walz.


There’s no such thing as common sense. Its just a way for people to claim their ideals as the standard because “I said so.”


Oh no, anyways…


I don’t approve of that kind of rhetoric as a general rule, but conflating calling someone inhuman for their cruel actions with calling someone inhuman for their perceived racial inferiority is incredibly disingenuous.


Does it matter when your government wipes its ass and balls with that constitution? At this point it’s a paper in a museum, nothing more.
Yes, it gives you just cause to seek retribution by any means necessary.
No, Waluigi.