Well, summer is within spitting distance, so prepare for a new record. :)

Fuck. That.

I think I start to understand. But how is it possible to move this many people with cars? I mean, for example, a family of four would then need, four different trips and essentially two different cars because if the adults do not work at the same place, how are they going to get to work on time? Or am I imagining it wrong?

What is “anti-homeless architecture”? Genuine question.

Edit: Also, thanks for the detailed answer.

Have you seen his human-growth-hormone belly? It would take years, man.

I’ve never been in the USA. Is it really that bad? I’ve heard that the USA have basically eradicated their own culture, because they destroyed their city centres in favour of suburbs, which need to be subsidised constantly. And therefore, cities sprawl. Is that true?

The numbers are calculated from the average of the EU27 killed travelers per billion person kilometers.

So in this case 2.5 perished by car, 0.07 perished by trains, (2.5/0.07~35.71).

Source: https://www.allianz-pro-schiene.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/verkehrssicherheit/

Critique of source: biased towards trains given their organisation’s purpose.

Edit: typo.

Well, we can thank Mr. Schröder for that. “Der Genosse der Bosse”

Tldr: Take the train and be safe.

Rant: In the EU, you are 35x more likely to die from a car crash, compared to a train crash. The union has created the so-called Vision Zero program, which is designed to reach zero driving deaths by some arbitrarily chosen date in the future. And of course it talks about autonomously driving cars. You know, crazy idea, but what if instead of we bet it all on some hypothetical magic Jesus technology that may or may not exist by the arbitrarily chosen date and instead focus on the real world solution that we already have? But well, the car industry investors would make less money, so I can answer that myself. :(

Edit: Also, Musk is a Nazi cunt who should die of cancer.