

They probably realized that they’re better off paying 3rd party devs to put their games on gamepass than developing their own games.
They probably realized that they’re better off paying 3rd party devs to put their games on gamepass than developing their own games.
Lots of modern cars have electric power steering. Many of them have lane keep assist.
James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher
Income and viewers are the same egg. You can put up sponsor segments but they’re no good if nobody is watching.
That does sound like it would help.
I mean that’s true but I don’t think that’s part of the chicken and egg cycle, as you can improve UX before getting users too
It’s a chicken and egg issue for sure, but I think you’ve got the wrong egg.
Nobody will create content on a platform with few viewers. Nobody will be a viewer on a platform with few content creators.
this is also a setting on both Android and iOS, with Android displaying the option to change access pretty much every time you pick out a file.
For photos at the very least, it’s the same on iOS. Haven’t tested with files. But anytime I needed to send people photos over FB Messenger, I’d add access to that one specific photo and nothing more. Until I got tired of it and added all photos. Oh well.
That’s my theory. They’ll pump out a few cookie cutter games on the existing IPs, but relatively little creativity is going to be allowed. It’s all for gamepass.
They’ve been touting Gamepass as the xbox seller for a long time now. Several years since they gave up on competing using exclusives if you ask me.