Alexander Daychilde

  • 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle




  • I disgree with the sub-point about plan-making. I’m 50, but thanks to health issues[1] I’m not likely to last another decade[2]. But while I do think about my probable looming death somewhat, I don’t fail to make any plans because of it. As far as I’m concerned, I’m going to live forever - until I don’t. I mean, that’s what my brain thinks.

    But I don’t think most of them probably think about death until they get ill.

    I’m not so worried about old people in politics - I think there should be a mix of young and old. You need strong young voices pushing for progress, and you need old experienced voices who have seen all this shit before and know how to deal with it.

    What we don’t need in politics is control by our oligarchs, which is what we have now that’s broken our democracy.


    1. thanks to undiagnosed ADHD and our lack-of-healthcare system in the US ↩︎

    2. Six heart attacks, a pulmonary embolism, kidney failure so I’m on dialysis ↩︎




  • The primary problem is that we have allowed our oligarchs to take control of our country. The oligarchs keep these older politicians around because they tend to serve them well, but it’s not really about age. It’s about the corruption. Follow the money. And the money flows from the oligarchs to the politicians who take that money and then serve the oligarchs.

    Do we need to fix our broken democracy? Yes, yes we do. And the first step is to break out the guillotines and handle the oligarch problem. Then sweep out all of those corrupt politicians. There’s a few that I’d keep - I think folks like AOC are not taking that money. And maybe there’s a Republican or two who might be the same, but I sure don’t know of any, but if there are, fine, keep them if they don’t support fasicsm. But sweet everyone else out. Time for a new Constitution with more protections, although you can’t fully protect the people from themselves. But we need to make sure nobody can get rich enough to control the government. Make it so people can get rich, fine, just not SUPER rich. Roll out social safety nets - universal health care, univeral basic income. Protect our rights.

    Can we do it? Well, maybe not. It’ll take a LOT. But that’s what we need to do, and the more of us that realize it and talk about it, the closer we get to any possibility of accomplishing it.



  • It’s kinda hilarious that propaganda in the US talked about “EU is always watching you” as a part of the propaganda against government regulations. While some places over there are starting to see the rise of fascist parties, I think awareness of the US’s fall into fascism is hurting their cause as people are a little more aware than they might otherwise be.

    And while I don’t generally like any government monitoring, if I had to choose, I’d choose EU monitoring over US monitoring any day, considering how our democracy has long been secondary to capitalism (with our own special twist of that old socialist phrase, for us “Taking the resources of the many to concentrate in the hands of the few ultra-wealthy”)

    Our oligarchs have corrupted the entire system, and our government allows us just enough to survive while funelling all the resources up to the oligarchs. They have more than they could possibly spend, and they still demand more More MORE M O R E.

    Back to cameras: In this case, more data, more control, more intimidation, more fear.


  • I know a lot of times replies are viewed as “You’re wrong!” but this, if anything, I think reinforces your comment:

    I went looking for statistics and couldn’t find any, but did run across these assertions:

    1. CCTVs of undefined/all types aupposedly increased crime clearance rates (“solved”) by around 20%. I suspect most of these are higher-quality ones in businesses or on public streets
    2. Amazon claims 55% reduction in crime in pilot programs with doorbell cameras but a study by some org of that situation found no statistical difference

    Certainly people are becoming more aware of those cameras and perhaps covering up to disguise their identity. So at most they might deter someone from going for your house, but as they become even more common, that effect will probably drop off.