In America, companies have more rights than the human person.

If companies say that they need to do something to survive, that makes it ok. If a human needs to do something to survive, that’s a crime.

Know the difference. (/s)

Yeah, you can train your own neural network on pirated content, all right, but you better not enjoy that content at the same time or have any feelings while watching it, because that’s not covered by “training”.

I mean, pirating media at scale for your own consumption can be considered “training of a neural network” as well…

Training that AI is absolutely fair use.

Selling that AI service that was trained on copyrighted material is absolutely not fair use.

i’ve heard rumors that they’ve made great surprises and developments so far; but i have nothing substantial to point you to, as it’s mostly rumors that i got from friends/other people at this point.

but it beats working 12h a day in the field to feed my familiy.

btw, people didn’t work 12 h a day in the field

the long work days are a result of capitalism. yes, progress has increased average work hours, instead of decreasing them.

focusing on the boils is meaningless; you take out one, another popus up.

the root problem needs to be addressed. i understand that people might have a difficult time understanding that, but capitalism is ultimately targeted towards making progress, and if there’s no more healthy progress to be made, it starts making unhealthy progress instead. Similar to a toe nail that won’t stop growing until you end up with an in-grown toe nail. And you know how painful that is.

We’d all be better off if we learned to question tech as a gift and see it for its grift.

deleted by creator

What kind of info do you think they could have had? With boeing, it’s probably something about corruption, pocketing state subsidy money that should have gone to actual projects, or something similar.

People love mocking Russians when their “leaders” fall out of windows, but where are these people when corpos kill plebs within US?

You assumed it was about being fair. People just like to shit on russia to distract from internal problems, it was never about the “people falling out of the window” thing.

According to the police records, the man committed suicide by shooting himself twice in the back of his head.

edit: after reading your comment more carefully, you actually already mentioned that. oopsie.

Did he fall out a window?

i think acetogens are biological entities, though?

wasn’t there some rule about industrial processes being 10x to 100x more efficient than biological beings, in general?

i find the technology itself more interesting than the scaling-up, because we can’t do anything about the scaling up (at least i don’t have billions of dollars that it would cost), but we can analyze the process qualitatively from home, that’s more exciting.

Interesting. I wonder how they catch the CO2 out of the air.

Ok, after reading (parts of) the paper:

• they use some amines on porous Silicate to catch the CO2 out of the air
• the whole process in the paper is actually a 2-step process, the first step being CO2 capture
• the second step describes how to convert CO2 into CO+H2 or sth

words only have meaning because there is reality behind them backing them up

if you have no economic strength, you cannot so easily make demands

Decentralization is an essential element of the Fediverse.

I don’t get how you would get around choosing a server. Maybe make the recommendation algorithm easier? Like, ask clearer questions, ask fewer questions?

Why are these articles even published? They are so incredibly non-technical that it’s just impossible to get the point as a reader.

Why even link these articles here? Throw that pop-science in the trash bin, where it belongs.

dd if=user-complaints of=/dev/zero

is exactly what apple will do with these complaints

you could just as well burn your money or drive your car into a tree, as a form of protest. it’s a waste, either of time, money, or energy, but nothing is achieved that way.