Her defiant reaction to the backlash was the worst part of it. She refuses to acknowledge people’s ire. She ends up making the case that she did it for Alaskans at the expense of the rest of her country. That she knew it was wrong but didn’t mind throwing everyone else under the bus.

How do they measure the difference between partial and full meltdowns?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dd7ySopIwog

By my understanding, 4chan left themselves vulnerable which, given the circles they foster, means they were going to be compromised. No fear of reprisal or consequence for it either. Not like when attacking a major corporation or government.