• 1 Post
  • 46 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 14th, 2025

help-circle


  • Apparently, it was required to be allowed in that state:

    Reading a bit more, during the sentencing phase in that state people making victim impact statements can choose their format for expression, and it’s entirely allowed to make statements about what other people would say. So the judge didn’t actually have grounds to deny it.
    No jury during that phase, so it’s just the judge listening to free form requests in both directions.

    It’s gross, but the rules very much allow the sister to make a statement about what she believes her brother would have wanted to say, in whatever format she wanted.

    From: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/18471175

    influence the sentence

    From what I’ve seen, to be fair, judges’ decisions have varied wildly regardless, sadly, and sentences should be more standardized. I wonder what it would’ve been otherwise.














  • joshchandra@midwest.socialtoTechnology@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I rather have them using AI to create it than having to go searching for real content.

    A rebuttal to this that I’ve read is that the easy access may encourage people to dig into it and eventually want “the real thing”… but regardless, with it being FOSS, there’s no easy way to stop it anyway… It’s just a Pandora’s box that we can never close.