Well, that’s less bad than 100% SEO optimized garbage with LLM generated spam stories around a few Amazon links.

Tesseract OCR is Open Source Software. How can it be a site that they steal information from?

With a bit of luck they still have a GDPR deletion process in place.

All that censorship, yet they could not be bothered to replace ChatGPT with deepseek in their stolen training data 😄

Can it generate images of Winnie the Pooh?

That’s not exactly a high bar

It’s not about why owns it. It’s about where young people can be without getting bothered by their parents and other old people.

Well, inside that text generator lies useful information, as well as misinformation of course, because it has been trained on exactly that. Does it make shit up? Absolutely. But so do and did a lot of google or bing search results, even prior to the AI-slop-content farm era.

And besides that, it is a fancy text generator that can use tools, such as searching bing (in case of ChatGPT) and summarizing search results. While not 100% accurate the summaries are usually fairly good.

In my experience the combination of information in the LLM, web search and asking follow up questions and looking at the sources gives better and much faster results than sifting though search results manually.

As long as you don’t take the first reply as gospel truth (as you should not do with the first google or bing result either) and you apply the appropriate amount of scrutiny based on the importance of your questions (as you should always do), ChatGPT is far superior to a classic web search. Which is, of course, where media literacy matters.

No. Learn to become media literate. Just like looking at the preview of the first google result is not enough blindly trusting LLMs is a bad idea. And given how shitty google has become lately ChatGPT might be the lesser of two evils.

Its 100€ if you can not prove that any harm was done. It could be more with proof (ie spam call logs etc)

There is no gray. Only black and white!

Says who? ChatGPT?

So THAT is why some of the McDonald’s bathrooms are so disgusting.

Those are just dns lookups.

It is. But it is open source and the encryption is solid. All communication data is end-to-end encrypted. They have been subpoenaed before and all they could provide was when the account was first registered and when it was last used. The signal protocol is well documented and open source. The foundation and LLC behind it are registered in California and are run by reputable people.

Telegram is run by shady people, supposedly out of Dubai, while it is registered in the British Virgin Islands. Its clients are also open source, however the encryption, if enabled, is of the home cooked variety, although it was improved over time. Unfortunately it is not enabled by default, you need to enter a „secure chat“ for that, which only works with single contacts, not with groups. Despite having access to everything else, and working like a social media-messenger-hybrid, telegram is very reluctant to get rid of clearly illegal content.

So that is how school transgender surgeries work.

Aaand … it’s ads. What a surprise.

Funny that it also works like it was made by mostly IT illiterate folk.

Sure, the twelfth time‘s the charm.

If you bought an Apple TV in 2015 you will still get at least this years tvOS update, if not more. How many devices has google announced and buried since then?

If they had more content on offer than the big legal streaming services combined, should that not tell us something about the quality of legal offers?