• 0 Posts
  • 106 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 27th, 2024

help-circle

  • that wasn’t my point, and i am not defending the Republicans. maybe that’s what people thought I was saying that I got downvoted? (not complaining, this just shows there are shortcomings in how i communicate my ideas).

    of course it’s deeply disturbing that they are embracing this label. and it’s all good that we can look at this at laugh at our enemies, think they are weird, or whatever. maybe i am a pessimist, but i am worried that this isn’t going to change anyone’s minds. the right wingers will look at this post and say “look at those dumb leftist, they just can’t understand sarcasm” and move on.

    you say this can change the minds of fence-sitters, obviously i don’t have any data to support or discredit that, so genuine question: have you seen anyone’s mind being changed by this?






  • Leaving aside the questions whether it would benefit us, what makes you think LLM won’t bring about technical singularity? Because, you know, the word LLM doesn’t mean that much… It just means it’s a model, that is “large” (currently taken to mean many parameters), and is capable of processing languages.

    Don’t you think whatever that will bring about the singularity, will at the very least understand human languages?

    So can you clarify, what is it that you think won’t become AGI? Is it transformer? Is it any models that trained in the way we train llms today?


  • nialv7@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldWhat If There’s No AGI?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Well, you described pretty well what llms were trained to do. But from there you can’t derive how they are doing it. Maybe they don’t have real knowledge, or maybe they do. Right now literally no one can definitively claim one way or the other, not even top of the field ML researchers. (They may have opinions though)

    I think it’s perfectly justified to hate AI, but it’s better to have a less biased view of what it is.