• 0 Posts
  • 167 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 29th, 2025

help-circle

  • Hey so I just wanna make one point about this that a lot of people aren’t going to like

    Whenever I said that Substack should be willing to host Nazi blogs, <blah> “YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND THE FIRST AMENDMENT IT’S A PRIVATE BUSINESS THEY CAN DO WHATEVER THEY WANT IT’S NOT THE GOVERNMENT”

    The point I’m trying to make though is “it’s a private business so they can censor whoever they want” isn’t really the rhetorical slam-dunk that some people seem to feel like it should be, and this is a good situation to point to for why that’s sometimes an important principle.

    You’re wrong in the above statements. It is a slam dunk. The situation with Kimmel and the FCC and Sinclair is a counterpoint to your argument, not backing. You don’t wanna see if that way. Thats fine 🤷🏻


  • You probably got shouted at in the past because you were wrong then, just as you are now.

    Free speech applies only to the government not interfering with your speech for good reason: the government should not stifle speech (with limits regarding shouting fire, or compelling violence ‘kill that guy!’). If a person hosting a forum or (via owning a business) talk show or tiny Lemmy instance decides they don’t want statements against their beliefs on the platform, its their free speech being exercised by removing it or placing rules stating “no nazi talk” on their service.

    If free speech applies to private businesses and they are forced by the government to host all opinions then it becomes compelled speech. “You must host Nazis rhetoric on your message board, by order of the government, you cannot infringe on an individual’s free speech”. It becomes a paradox, free speech of the individual overrules free speech of the hosting individual or group.

    The example you’re using here is particularly backwards - because the FCC (the government) is pushing to have pro-Alt-right (pro Charlie Kirk) messaging pushed on all privately owned platforms, and punishing any platforms or individuals who disagree. They are compelling speech. That is the antithesis of free speech, yet you somehow see it as, “look, Sinclair banning Kimmel is the same as Nazis being banned from Substack,” and they are actually not the same at all when you look at context.

    In addition, if your platform hosts hate speech (Nazis, alt-right fascists, etc) then congrats - your platform is not a ‘free speech haven’, it’s just a fascist platform. Look at 4chan, 8chan, 8kun, even Twitter - once the site runners decide it’s ok to keep fascist content up, they become fascist / white supremacist platforms. If site owners don’t want that to happen to their site, they moderate and ban and post rules - their free speech but your argument is that this is a bad thing and they should instead host all opinions?









  • Yeah and it only took evolution (checks notes) 4 billion years to go from nothing to a brain valuable to humans.

    I’m not so sure there will be a fast return in any economic timescale on the money investors are currently shovelling into AI.

    We have maybe 500 years (tops) to see if we’re smart enough to avoid causing our own extinction by climate change and biodiversity collapse - so I don’t think it’s anywhere near as clear cut.


  • The consumer has spoken and they don’t care, not even for 4K. Same as happened with 3D and curved TVs, 8K is a solution looking for a problem so that more TVs get sold.

    In terms of physical media - at stores in Australia the 4K section for Blurays takes up a single rack of shelves. Standard Blurays and DVDs take up about 20.

    Even DVDs still sell well because many consumers don’t see a big difference in quality, and certainly not enough to justify the added cost of Bluray, let alone 4K editions. A current example, Superman is $20 on DVD, $30 on Bluray (50% cost increase) or $40 on 4K (100%) cost increase. Streaming services have similar pricing curves for increased fidelity.

    It sucks for fans of high res, but it’s the reality of the market. 4K will be more popular in the future if and when it becomes cheaper, and until then nobody (figuratively) will give a hoot about 8K.




  • Right here, this is fine with me.

    The US was incredibly stupid to not demand shares in the US banks when they had them over a barrel and crapping themselves in 2008 - and instead gave them tens of billions of interest-free loans and literal handouts. Capitalism, right up until the companies that are ‘too big to fail’ go belly-up and fuck the entire world economy with their stupid decisions, then its, “oh can we please have some socialism? No, we will not agree to any public ownership or shares lol … And no there can be no strings attached - wtf we deserve those executive bonuses this year - just give us the money. Thx plebs! Thoughts and prayers for your mortgage”.