PimpMyPhoto.

Bin Laden wanted the US out of Saudi Arabia. They aren’t and Saudia Arabia is currently on a shopping spree of US companies.

Nothing wrong with photogimp.

He wants to be in charge, and not held responsible.

Stanley’s aren’t popular anymore?

Not using turn signal? Straight to jail.

A USB stick is probably the best. Now USB-A or USB-C?

It’ll be “it’s the economy stupid”.

He got a break so he got to blame Obama first and now he gets to blame Biden.

3rd world. Anyone that uses the old definiton is being intentionally obtuse. And annoying.

Haiti is on the list of 19 countries with full or partial restrictions, which also includes Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela.

deleted by creator

It just got too toxic when she turned on Trump. Pension was coincidence that it was only a couple months away so announce to take the heat off and stick around doing nothing.

No they aren’t lending legitimacy, and no they are not helping prop up, and no its power won’t crumble. And no, they will think about the big picture rather than throwing a tantrum and quitting which won’t accomplish anything. Scratch that, not only will it not accomptlish anything, quitting will set back the country another 50 years. The intelligent thing to do is to stay, for alllll the reasons I have already outlined. I’m just repeating myself and you are not absorbing anything so I’m out.

Oh yeah just better hand it over for the next 50 years when no one else cares about their names or blames them if they do. This is peak lemmy.

Because in 5-15 years there’s a sliver chance the court could be Dem majority/normal. If they all resign that goes to 30 to 40 years.

Depends how dirty you accept the power.

Damn Samsung, they ruined Samsung!

See? You are trying to divert the discussion about the article to anything but the article. You really want to get this off topic to anything else you can because the facts work against you.

This is literally about the article. How you think the article and a thread about the article and all the comments about the article is in fact not about the article is beyond me. You simply don’t want to acknowledge the article and the discussion about the article or the facts of the article or the positions of the article because it works against you. So you ignore the article and the facts of the article and the comments of the article and try to divert the discussion of the article to anything but the article.

And again: I am informing protest-non-voters what they voted for. You know, Trump overturning fuel efficiency because that s what the article and the entire thread is about.