

Literally 1984.
This is a textbook example of newspeak / doublethink, exactly how they use the word “corruption” to mean different things based on who it’s being applied to.
🏵️ 𝔈𝔵𝔠𝔢𝔩𝔰𝔦𝔬𝔯 ℭ𝔞𝔢𝔩𝔦𝔰, 𝔓𝔯𝔬𝔣𝔲𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔬𝔯 ℑ𝔫𝔣𝔢𝔯𝔫𝔦𝔰 🏵️
Literally 1984.
This is a textbook example of newspeak / doublethink, exactly how they use the word “corruption” to mean different things based on who it’s being applied to.
I agree with the message, but these two points following each other feels a little hypocritical:
“Amazon is supporting new nuclear plants” and “Amazon has a poor climate record”
Nuclear power is the most effective way to get out of climate change. Caring about climate change and being against nuclear power at the same time is a contradictory position to take, and needlessly puritanical.
If we could only rely on renewables, that would be very nice. That is not currently the case. We should strive to have more renewable energy, while keeping in mind nuclear power is here to stay and even be expanded as we eliminate carbon emitting sources of energy.
Corrected !
I only read 1984 once in French 11 years ago, so it’s a little fuzzy 😆