Hello, tone-policing genocide-defender and/or carnist 👋
Instead of being mad about words, maybe you should think about why the words bother you more than the injustice they describe.
Have a day!
You’re a different kind of VM enjoyer than me, and that’s okay 😎 I’m glad GNOME Boxes and virt-manager are getting the job done for you. I’m okay with the latter, but I think it needs some love, which is why I’m eager to see alternative frontend options.
Docker works. Podman requires a ton of workarounds and wastes my time. I hope it gets good one day, but I’m not reverting to using systemd to manage containers.
This isn’t just VirtualBox. It’s VirtualBox with a KVM back end. So you get the performance of KVM, but with a much better GUI than virt-manager.
Well, MIT projects can be forked into a new GPLv3 project, right? If Canonical cared, they could have done that to assuage this concern.
I think it’s a valid concern. Pushover licenses are bad. But even if a GPL Rust coreutils project exists (I actually have one, but I don’t have the same goals), it seems unlikely that Canonical would be bothered to pivot to it.
Ah, to live in a world without JavaScript and weird, Nazi crypto dipshits 🥰
Thanks for sharing! Bounds checks are a fair critique. The Rust Performance Book suggests that bounds checking has little performance impact compared to many other factors that you could optimize out, but it’s certainly not zero performance impact, as I initially claimed.
Unless you’re talking about some sort of reference counting, which has to be explicitly added by the programmer in cases where doing so is required for memory safety, I’m not sure what runtime checks you’re referring to?
From what I’ve seen, the performance of programs written in C and Rust are generally the same, more or less, with C or Rust coming out on top with roughly coinflip odds in a handful of cases. This feels like the primary differentiator in performance really comes down to the implementation of the person writing it, and less to do with any performance differences inherent to either language.
“Thing I say is good, is better than thing I say is mediocre.”
Indeed.
This is not true. If you know Rust and C equally well, you’re likely going to write equally performant Rust.
You could say that Rust is harder to learn than C. I’d disagree based on my personal experience, but you wouldn’t be wrong.
I have no idea how. I write better Rust than I do C 🤷♂️
Rust and C are basically identical in terms of performance (more or less). Idk where the myth that Rust is somehow less performant than C came from.
The ill-informed Rust hatred goes in the Phoronix comments. Rust isn’t inherently slower than C. This was a bug.
People just don’t like reading slop from lying machines. It’s really just that simple.
Polluting a chat thread with slop is just a rude thing to do. Nobody like sloppers.
If you couldn’t be bothered to think or write for yourself, why would you think anyone would be bothered to read that?? It’s literally just pollution.
So many Rust projects are dual-licensed under Apache or MIT. It’s just a convention that many Rust projects have adopted. Yes, it’s true that there’s nothing intrinsic about Rust the language that requires a certain license type. But it doesn’t mean that the Rust community hasn’t adopted a convention of licensing with pushover licenses. That’s my point.
Using Rust != required to use pushover licenses. It’s just a bad convention that a lot of Rust projects adopt.
The owning class is the only minority group that does you any harm.
The grown-ups that run Fedora and the community are overwhelmingly against this very bad proposal, so I don’t think the reich-wing creep’s toy project is going to replace the official XServer implementation any time soon.
This probably has a lot to do with the new DOA XServer fork being “anti-DEI” (pro-discrimination). When these slimy shitweasels go out and vice signal about how bigoted they are, they congregate around it and form a new harassment campagin because they have no life.
Sorry you’re getting harassed. I hope you can take solace in the fact that these little pissbabies lead miserable lives.
If you are in the US, ROMs aren’t illegal either. You’re just required to rip them from a cartridge/disc you acquired legally (including second-hand purchases) and you can’t distribute it to others. It’s the latter part that makes it illegal (but not at all immoral). If you wanna do that last part, god bless. Fuck these companies.
It is unwise for anyone to bet against certain odds.