It’s common practice to “blackhole” targets of DDoS attacks as a defensive measure. Blackholing means that packets coming into the network for a specific IP get discarded which lowers the stress on the network and especially on the receiving server. The server will work as if there was no attack but will only be accessible on non blackholed IPs. This would of course require the IPv6 to not get attacked either.

I’m guessing that’s what’s happening here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_(networking)

Some dad is doing this so his son would come out the basement for Christmas and spend time with the family.

Lmao “enabler”.

Oh I didn’t even think of this. There are so many companies that could get into trouble because of this, and they will all get mad at the AI bullshitters.

I tend to get decent results by saying I want neither A or B when asking for C.

This is more apophenia than numerology.

• 200g [redacted]
• 100g [redacted]
• [redacted] diced
• [redacted]
• [redacted]
• salt
• pepper

Said proudly by the hostile actors.

That’s awful.

And illegal.

Interesting, thanks.

What about Emby Theater?

Nobody talking about Emby?

Why not? I haven’t used it yet but it seems great too.

Hey it’s Wanheda.

Kali is not for actual every day use.

You can install all of its included tools on whatever distro you want.

The tool doesn’t just check the text for errors it would know of. It can also check sources, compare articles, and find inconsistencies within the article itself.

There’s a list of the problems it found that often explains where it got the correct information from.

Oh I read that completely different. With a “if we would all use it” in there.

If the shown dates are the dates of completion, the span would not be May 12th to May 14th but May 3th to May 12th.

inFAMOUS: First Light has 4 hours for the main story. Which fits this idea. But I don’t use the website.

Why would they be American?

Satellite TV is a service that requires constant upkeep by the companies which costs money.

And your football stadium is a bad analogy.

So the article is a joke and untrue?

Fahlman entered the discussion with his now-famous post: “I propose that the following character sequence for joke markers: :-) Read it sideways.” He added that serious messages could use :-(, noting, “Maybe we should mark things that are NOT jokes, given current trends.”

From there, the smiley could spread across the emerging global computer network, and no one would ever misunderstand a joke online again. :-)

Is that last post of the article meant as a joke or not? I do not understand.