• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    With the reputation most companies have with leaking and breached data, who wouldn’t want to have their ssn and license on file with rock star games?!

    • themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      This falls on the parents instead because of dumb laws every one has to deal with this, I just hope that not all countries are this insane:

      users in the UK have had to take photos of themselves and upload it to a service that uses AI to guess their age. Or, send in photos of ID such as passports or driving licenses.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Year 2025 - politicians are held under control by evidence of them having raped children

          Year 2035 - politicians are held under control by evidence of them having made children outside of the state incubator

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      The point is to make children used to checks.

      It’s a didactic law.

      IRL usually children grow up feeling they are free (except for their parents) to an extent.

      This is intended so that identifying yourself in the Internet were normal by the time you grow up for it to matter.

      But, of course, there might be some good considerations, if you’re into playing devil’s advocate. People might remember which stupid shit they were posting when they were younger, and want for future generations to be always conscious of the difference between pseudonymity and anonymity, and superficial anonymity vs real. People might want to make it so that nobody had a false sense of security, leading to really bad mistakes. People might want this to be the step preceding some way to fight bots.

      And they might even not have good considerations, but eventually realize that the oppressive system they are building is best rebuilt for something better and used differently. Wouldn’t be the first time in history.

      It’s just that laying down your arms in hopes for that is unwise.

    • seralth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s M rated. M ratings are 17+ the ESRB rating for 18+ is AO.

      M ratings are for minors, AO is for adults.

      You need to ID to buy an AO game, you do not for M unless it’s a individual store policy.

      Due to anti porn sentiment and stores refusing to carry porn. Only 24 games have ever gotten the AO rating

      It’s considered a death flag.

      It’s much like how the Deadpool movie was R rated instead of pg13. This was considered a huge risk cause R rates movies don’t make money was the common theory.

      But even then R rating is also for minors. Movies have the NC-17 rating which is for 18+ and thus only adults. This would be the AO rating in games.

      Stores and public facing businesses are so piss scared of having adult rated content even if it’s not porn, just because of the vague idea that adult only content HAS to be porn cause “what else would it be”

      That rating systems have undermined their very purpose and become fucking useless. It’s why everything is only M rated instead of being AO when it really should be.

      • tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s not really relevant as the UK rating system doesn’t have M or AO clarifications. The game is rated 18 so it’s for adults only.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 days ago

    If they roll this out to my country, I’m just not buying any of their games. My privacy is worth a lot more than that.

    I might still play them, I just won’t buy them, because I’m not doing age verification.

  • AlphaOmega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    Can you even call it GTA online if there aren’t a dozen 12 year olds running around screaming, “N***** and F*****”.

  • heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m already boycotting rockstar, just make offline games and stop with the invasive bs

    Now my money is going to indie developers

  • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 days ago

    Maybe I’m dating myself but this is the same company that released state of emergency for the PS2? That game you could literally mow down people in a mall with a mini gun?

    They were worried about “the children?” News to me.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      My mum enjoyed the bonus level in the mall where you could just kill like 100 people as fast as you could.

      Her favourite weapon is the flamethrower.

      Her first reaction to the game was “that’s disgusting”, but I let her have a go and suddenly she was toasting a whole crowd and loving every minute of it.

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean the whole “ban gta” movement was started by rockstar themselves. They riled up the masses about how dangerous gta is, and it worked. The moms hopped onto the train and the whole movement gained momentum and the made billions.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    guess ill be pirating the next one, since there will be no online mode.

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The thing with age verification is that I don’t think it’s a bad thing if done securely, but still it still makes me sad, because Internet will never be the same with it. In the end it will be only few big websites who can afford to care about Internet regulation.

    Well, after all maybe it’s time to switch to Gemini protocol, they are not going to regulate that!

    • ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      age verification is just a BS strawman. do you remember when we where young? we would access stuff and find ways to buy stuff. but whenever there was a reasonable but fair gap, it would be much harder to get whatever we wanted: buying weed was so much easier, than buying alcohol (without the appropriate age).

      pirating is easy (even i figured it out before having enough money to buy movies & games). so the kids will just pirate that stuff and get their way anyway. age verification at the store makes so much more sense. sure, there are ways to circumvent those. but it is a reasonable stop block.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        When I couldnt buy digital stuff because of age restrictions (e.g. game shops) I at one point figured out that Steam doesnt do that and you could get Paysafecards to buy them this way.
        No need for paypal (which needs an online banking enabled SEPA account or credit card) or a credit card.

        • ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          exactly what i am talking about. age restriction at the physical store kept you away for a while, while not forcing an alternative/underground market. however, if you knew the only way to get it is on an alternative store - you would immediately have looked there.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Don’t see how pirating well overcome the online age check.

          • Matriks404@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            But Rockstar Games acquired FiveM back in 2023, so I don’t see how is that relevant to piracy. In fact even if it wasn’t, there was nothing illegal about it as far as I am aware.

            • ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              if you can run a private server, you can get rid of all ‘phone home’ requirements.

              so you just need a cracked copy of the game itself. luckily it is completely legal to remove digital locks on anything you bought in many countries (not the usa though).

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Parents will just have their kids play on their accounts. This only hurts the average person who now needs to worry about who has that information and how it’s secured.

      • bless@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        If that’s true its going to be funny when the account gets banned because of something kiddo did

  • vxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    The same parents that allow their children to play these games now will allow them to play then.

    This will just make me not want to play these games.

  • schizolol9@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Im bout to crash out this is absolutely the most stupidest idea ever. Anyone should be able to play this game regardless of age.

    • seralth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      If the game isn’t rated AO it shouldn’t have an age verification.

      R rating is fucking 17+ not 18+. R rating is still for minors.

      If your game needs an age rating then you shouldn’t be allowed to have an R rating straight to AO for you.

      Oh what’s that visa won’t let you sell your AO rated game?

      Too fucking bad.

      Maybe find a better solution then. ):<

  • Joelk111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    What about disabling the shitty anti-cheat or even just enabling it on Linux so I, as a 27yo, can play the damn game?