“This ban is a massive win for Texas ranchers, producers, and consumers,” Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller said in a statement following the bill’s passage. “Texans have a God-given right to know what’s on their plate, and for millions of Texans, it better come from a pasture, not a lab. It’s plain cowboy logic that we must safeguard our real, authentic meat industry from synthetic alternatives.”

Texas joins Indiana, Mississippi, Montana and Nebraska in enacting new laws this year; Alabama and Florida did so last year. In March, the Oklahoma House approved a similar bill that did not advance out of the Senate this session.

  • pheggs@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, I am all in for labeling, but banning it? Is that what’s happening? why would anyone do that

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        24 hours ago

        If the meat companies had any sense, they’d be pushing for and funding it. That much moneyh and not owning the competition is just flat out stupid.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Exactly, they would profit more from planting whatever crop is needed to supply raw materials to the lab-grown facility, than the efficiency loss of raising cattle for protien

        • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          That’s the thing. It’s too late for them to get in on the real ground floor. The tech is already basically here with increasingly well established companies. Now the cheapest best optionfor the old meat companies to stay competitive is to try to block the new competition. Of course that method won’t hold up long term but we all know shareholders only care about next quarter.