cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/20071879
OK, so that is in the running for clickbait hed of the year, but it’s actually apt for the column.
It may seem paradoxical to write this in an opinion piece. But it needs saying: arguments alone have no meaningful effect on people’s beliefs. And the implicit societal acceptance that they do is getting in the way of other, more effective forms of political thinking and doing.
I’m a researcher who studies the intersection of psychology and politics, and my work has increasingly led me to believe that our culture’s understanding of how political persuasion works is wrong. In the age of Donald Trump, Elon Musk and the rise of the far right, commentators have endlessly opined on the problems of fake news, polarisation and more. But they’ve mostly been looking in the wrong places – and have focused too much on words.
Take “debates”. They’re a central part of most election campaigns around the world, seen as so influential that they’re often governed by strict rules around media coverage and balance. Yet evidence suggests that watching debates has no impact on opinions whatsoever. In 2019 researchers analysed 56 TV debates in 22 elections in the US, Canada, New Zealand and Europe from 1952 to 2016. The study tracked nearly 100,000 respondents to see whether debates helped undecided or decided voters to make up or change their minds. They found no evidence that they did. In 2012, a reporter ran another analysis about whether debates influenced election outcomes. As he put it: “The effects of debates on eventual votes are likely mild, and, in most cases, effectively nil.”
It doesn’t matter how detailed my description would be and how much hard evidence I would provide (Arguments, like in the article above!). You don’t know me and you’re not walking in my shoes either. Because of that it’s impossible for you to understand. Which is okay, I’m used to it. I walk away in peace and take my vote with me.
Well you could try. It might be enlightening for people like me who don’t know where you’re coming from or who your comments refer to. There are lots of different kinds of “progressives” so when you talk about them using this very general word I really don’t know who you have in mind.
They can’t explain because it’s a BS take. Different walks of life for two people have no bearing on the general population, progressives, or how they feel about each other. Perhaps there are some progressives that meet the initial claim, but that claim was directed at progressives and moderates in general.
Literally all of them now. No No true Scotsman possible.