• ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Normally people quote something like that when they’re trying to point out something damning or draw attention to something that’s internally inconsistent… Is that what you mean?

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      No, and sorry if it came off like that. It’s just such a quick short way to sum up this moment and my thoughts on it that I felt it was worth repeating. Shouted from the rooftops, even. But I can certain see why you’d make that assumption; it’s a pretty common shit talking strategy.

    • Sidhean@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Is that what you read? What feels inconsistent or worth reexamining here, do you think?

      I thought they quoted it because they liked it. I think it’s a sentiment I’ve seen repeated a lot here.

      • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Ah, that could be the case I guess. But it’s not that i had a feeling of inconsistency: it’s just that I could understand how someone may see “violence is unacceptable” followed by “but glad he’s dead” to be disingenuous or some form of hypocrisy without thinking much about it; wouldn’t be the first time that I’ve had such a discussion.

        A shortcut to understanding would be: I’d feel the same way if he had been killed by terminal cancer. I hate cancer, and I’d rather we lived in a world without it, and I’d have empathy for him and those who know him. But such a person being gone would still tip the cosmic scales towards a less hateful and othering world. Doesn’t make it right, doesn’t mean he deserved it, doesn’t mean I’d cheer for cancer.