• CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    No one here seems to have read the article.

    This bill will NOT require ID uploads or any official documents. It is simply mandating a setting that upon device setup that a parent must state the age of the user using the device. That’s it.

    Sounds more like a legal framework for the companies to absolve themselves of the responsibility of protecting kids if they happen to see adult content. They can point and say it’s the parents fault for not inputting the age setting correctly.

    It passed the assembly unanimously.

      • CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You are absolutely right, but that doesn’t stop a shitty lawyer from suing companies for it.

        We also shouldn’t have to put dumb warning labels on sleeping pills that tell people not drive cars or operate heavy machinery, but we do because a lawyer made an argument and won somehow.

        • al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I love it every time you open a pill bottle you need to connect to Internet and have ai scan your face and id to prove you’re an adult. Hmm so you want to take warning labels off and have the dumb people fight the lawyers to the death? I accept your proposal.

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I have a sneaking suspicion that if one cuts through all of the details, what one will find is that the thing that really sets this proposal apart, and has earned it Silicon Valley’s support, is that it’s complex and/or expensive enough that established megacorporate social media will be able to meet its provisions but new startups will not, so itwill serve as a barrier to entry to protect their oligopoly.

    • bigfondue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Absolutely. What’s really frightening though is that companies will now have your real identity, so if the Regime doesn’t like something you post they can send ICE to your house.

      • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The bill also faces last-minute opposition from a powerful California film industry group, foreshadowing a tense debate between Hollywood and Silicon Valley that may force Newsom to choose between the two iconic California industries.

        What I find really frightening is that there’s no mention of doing what’s best for the people of California.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Why not force people to identify themselves. Not like they’d go full fascist on us, right?

    Right?

  • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    (Sports announcer voice) He could do it folks! He could cut the knees off of his presidential aspirations right here!

    • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Or, he could put it through, and make friends enough with the terrifyingly oligarchic forces that run our society that he might all of a sudden become the “default choice” in the same way that Biden and Hilary were, and they might agree to kneecap anyone who tries to Bernie Sanders him. And we might have six more weeks of winter, so to speak.