• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Why? It wasn’t there submersible, their product wasn’t responsible for its destruction and frankly there is very little in the way of public sympathy.

    The product is not even rated as waterproof and yet it’s survived months at the bottom of the ocean after having survived a destructive implosion.

    That’s hella marketing.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The marketing is more for the submersible camera that survived, just like it was designed to do, the SD card was just inside the camera and no water even touched it. I don’t think the SD card should be getting any credit.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah I know but marketing is marketing. It doesn’t really have to make any sense.

        If the Xbox controller had survived I’m sure Microsoft would have made big of that even though it’s basically irrelevant to the product.