fossilesque@mander.xyz to Data is Beautiful@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 days agoSometimes the beauty is in the data.mander.xyzimagemessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up1378arrow-down17
arrow-up1371arrow-down1imageSometimes the beauty is in the data.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyz to Data is Beautiful@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 days agomessage-square124fedilink
minus-squareTheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·19 days agoAt the top it says ‘share of people’, which means the numbers are a percentage
minus-squareEncephalotrocity@biglemmowski.winlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down20·19 days agoSo, not on the axis and vague enough for you to be confident in your assumption. Beautiful.
minus-squareLemminary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days agoI say it’s pretty damn simple to infer, and so it’s a safe assumption. I’m not sure what your hangup is, other than being strict.
minus-squareEncephalotrocity@biglemmowski.winlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days agohttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/nov/19/doing-your-own-research-isnt-a-bad-thing-i-tell-my-patients-but-just-how-will-they-spot-the-fraudulent-papers
At the top it says ‘share of people’, which means the numbers are a percentage
So, not on the axis and vague enough for you to be confident in your assumption. Beautiful.
I say it’s pretty damn simple to infer, and so it’s a safe assumption. I’m not sure what your hangup is, other than being strict.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/nov/19/doing-your-own-research-isnt-a-bad-thing-i-tell-my-patients-but-just-how-will-they-spot-the-fraudulent-papers